Grammarly Is Offering ‘Expert’ AI Reviews From Your Favorite Authors—Dead or Alive

2026-03-04 · Source: WIRED - Ai · Field: Technology & Digital — Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning, Emerging Technologies & Innovation, Content Creation & Production · Depth: Fundamental Awareness, quick

Summary

Grammarly has introduced a new feature offering "Expert" AI reviews that simulate feedback from famous authors and academics, including those who are deceased. This functionality allows users to receive stylistic and grammatical corrections in the perceived voice of their favorite literary figures. The company reportedly developed and launched this feature without seeking explicit permission from the estates or living individuals whose styles are being emulated. This development raises questions regarding intellectual property rights, consent, and the ethical implications of using AI to mimic the creative output and critical voice of individuals, particularly posthumously, without prior authorization.

Key takeaway

For product managers and legal teams developing AI features that mimic human creative output, you must prioritize securing explicit consent from individuals or their estates. Your due diligence should include a thorough review of intellectual property rights and potential posthumous rights, as launching features without permission can lead to significant ethical and legal challenges.

Key insights

Grammarly's AI reviews mimic authors, raising consent and intellectual property concerns.

Principles

• AI emulation requires explicit permission.
• Posthumous digital rights are complex.

Topics

• Grammarly AI
• AI Writing Assistance
• Intellectual Property
• AI Ethics
• Author Simulation

Best for: CTO, VP of Engineering/Data, Director of AI/ML, AI Ethicist, Legal Professional, Tech Journalist

Related on AIssential

• Our Rules for AI Writing — Ethical AI writing involves using AI as an assistant, not a ghostwriter, to preserve human authorship, learning, and accountability.
• German court rules AI comic adaptation of copyrighted photo doesn't violate the original — AI-generated adaptations of copyrighted works may not infringe if specific creative elements are not copied.
• A popular horror novel was pulled over AI concerns – here’s what it means for publishing — The "Shy Girl" controversy highlights publishing's unpreparedness for AI's real-world impact and the resulting climate of distrust.
• ‘Obvious markers of AI’: doubts raised over winner of short story prize — The definitive detection of AI-generated creative work remains elusive, posing challenges for literary awards and publishers.
• Claude Writes Better Than Me. Am I Even a Writer Anymore? — Human writing's value stems from unique lived experience, not just technical efficiency, a domain AI cannot replicate.
• Is this blog written by AI? — The author distinguishes between AI's role in human-facing text (no) and code (yes), prioritizing human connection in writing.

Open in AIssential →

Editorial summary, takeaway, and curation by AIssential. Original article published by WIRED - Ai.