Closing the Gap at CRAC 2026: Two-Stage Adaptation for LLM-Based Multilingual Coreference Resolution

· Source: cs.CL updates on arXiv.org · Field: Technology & Digital — Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning, Natural Language Processing, Software Development & Engineering · Depth: Expert, extended

Summary

A system submitted to the LLM track of the CRAC 2026 shared task achieved the top rank in its track and third overall, with an average CoNLL F1 score of 74.32 on the official test set. The system is based on the Gemma-3-27b model, fine-tuned using a two-stage adaptation strategy: a multilingual base adapter followed by dataset-specific adapters. Key design choices included representing mention spans by their headword using a minimal XML-inspired format with local reindexing, and iteratively annotating documents. This approach proved effective across various languages, document lengths, and annotation guidelines, significantly closing the performance gap between LLM-based systems and traditional coreference resolution pipelines. The research also highlighted the importance of addressing annotation heterogeneity across datasets.

Key takeaway

For AI Engineers developing multilingual coreference resolution systems, adopting a two-stage fine-tuning approach with a strong base model like Gemma-3-27b and specialized adapters for diverse datasets is crucial. Your team should also prioritize optimizing input formats, such as minimal XML headword representation, and implement local reindexing to manage coreference IDs effectively, as these strategies significantly enhance performance and address annotation inconsistencies.

Key insights

Two-stage fine-tuning and optimized input formats enable LLMs to achieve state-of-the-art multilingual coreference resolution.

Principles

Method

The system fine-tunes Gemma-3-27b using QLoRA with a two-stage strategy: a multilingual base adapter, then dataset-specific continual SFT. It employs a minimal XML headword format, local reindexing, and an iterative, on-the-fly cleaning process.

In practice

Topics

Code references

Best for: AI Engineer, Research Scientist, AI Scientist, Machine Learning Engineer, NLP Engineer

Related on AIssential

Open in AIssential →

Editorial summary, takeaway, and curation by AIssential. Original article published by cs.CL updates on arXiv.org.