Aspects of Selecting the Right ASR Training Languages for Under-Resourced Languages

· Source: Paper Index on ACL Anthology · Field: Technology & Digital — Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning, Computational Linguistics · Depth: Expert, medium

Summary

A study presented at ComputEL-9 in July 2026 by J. Elizabeth Liebl, Summer Chambers, Matthew Kelley, and Géraldine Walther investigates optimal training language selection for cross-lingual IPA Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) on under-resourced languages. The researchers trained multilingual IPA-based ASR models for Upper Sorbian, Luganda, and Tatar using Common Voice audio and Vox Communis phonetic transcripts. They evaluated three linguistically motivated strategies—genealogical relatedness, geographic proximity, and phonological inventory overlap—against a random baseline, measuring performance with phone error rate. While linguistically informed selection generally improved transfer, no single strategy proved consistently optimal. Geographic proximity was most effective for Luganda, phonological overlap slightly better for Tatar, but none of the strategies surpassed random selection for Upper Sorbian. The findings indicate that linguistic similarity aids low-resource ASR transfer, though the most beneficial similarity dimension varies by target language.

Key takeaway

For NLP Engineers developing ASR systems for under-resourced languages, you should move beyond generic cross-lingual transfer approaches. Your selection of training languages must be tailored, as the most effective linguistic similarity dimension—whether genealogical, geographic, or phonological—is highly language-dependent. Systematically evaluate different similarity metrics for your specific target language, as a "one-size-fits-all" strategy may not outperform random selection, particularly for languages like Upper Sorbian.

Key insights

Optimal linguistic similarity for low-resource ASR transfer is target-language dependent.

Principles

Method

Train multilingual IPA-based ASR models using Common Voice audio and Vox Communis phonetic transcripts, evaluating genealogical, geographic, and phonological similarity strategies against a random baseline with phone error rate.

In practice

Topics

Best for: AI Scientist, NLP Engineer, Research Scientist

Related on AIssential

Open in AIssential →

Editorial summary, takeaway, and curation by AIssential. Original article published by Paper Index on ACL Anthology.