Trump gets OpenAI to offer US 5% stake, far lower than Sanders’ target

2026-07-02 · Source: AI - Ars Technica · Field: Government & Public Sector — Public Policy & Governance, Regulatory & Compliance · Depth: Fundamental Awareness, short

Summary

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman is reportedly in early talks with the Trump administration regarding the US acquiring a 5 percent stake in the leading AI firm. This proposal aims to share AI's economic upside with the public and combat growing anti-AI sentiment, as recent polls show 70 percent of Americans oppose local AI data centers and half are more concerned than excited about AI. OpenAI suggests creating a sovereign wealth fund, similar to Alaska's, to provide citizens with a stake in AI-driven growth. However, Senator Bernie Sanders has countered with a much larger proposal, advocating for a one-time 50 percent tax on leading AI firms' stock, estimated to yield \$7 trillion, for public programs or direct payments. Sanders also proposes a bipartisan Independent Commission for Democratic AI with voting shares to block harmful decisions by AI firms, arguing a 5% stake is insufficient for public control.

Key takeaway

For policymakers weighing AI regulation and public benefit, you should critically assess proposals for public stakes in AI firms. OpenAI's 5% stake offer aims to share economic upside and address public concern, but Senator Sanders' \$7 trillion tax and independent commission plan offers a more substantial public control mechanism. Consider how your legislative actions can balance innovation with robust public oversight and equitable distribution of AI-driven wealth.

Key insights

OpenAI proposes a 5% US stake to share AI's economic benefits and mitigate public apprehension, facing a counter-proposal from Senator Sanders.

Principles

• Public financial stake can share AI upside.
• Sovereign wealth funds can distribute AI-driven growth.
• Public commissions can ensure AI accountability.

Method

OpenAI's conceptual proposal involves Congress implementing mechanisms for the US to take a stake in AI firms, potentially via a sovereign wealth fund.

In practice

• Evaluate public ownership models for AI firms.
• Consider sovereign wealth funds for tech dividends.
• Establish independent commissions for AI oversight.

Topics

• OpenAI
• AI Regulation
• Public Ownership
• Sovereign Wealth Funds
• AI Governance
• US Tech Policy

Best for: Investor, Policy Maker, Executive, Tech Journalist

Related on AIssential

• Bernie Sanders’ AI Sovereign Wealth Fund Plan — Public ownership of AI companies risks aligning government with corporate profit, making taxation and public AI options superior for societal benefit.
• Trump’s AI-stake idea is not free-market competition but a form of state-backed techno-nationalism that could entrench incumbents and quietly de-risk firms like OpenAI. — Trump's AI stakeholding is techno-nationalism, not free competition, risking incumbent entrenchment and de-risking firms, while Europe seeks sovereign AI.
• Trump wants AI companies to share their wealth with the public. How Republicans are reacting - ThePrint — Political debate centers on mechanisms for public wealth-sharing from AI, with proposals ranging from direct benefits to sovereign wealth funds.
• Bernie Sanders Saw This Coming — Sanders argues AI's transformative power necessitates public ownership and regulation to prevent oligarchic control and ensure societal benefit.
• Bernie's plan sucks, actually — Bernie Sanders' AI wealth fund proposal is critiqued as unconstitutional and economically flawed, contrasting with established sovereign wealth fund principles.
• All signs point to Trump pushing AI growth — The US government under Trump is poised to accelerate AI growth, while Anthropic's "pause" advocacy appears to be a strategic branding move amidst its IPO.

Open in AIssential →

Editorial summary, takeaway, and curation by AIssential. Original article published by AI - Ars Technica.