AI startup Lindy ditched Claude entirely for Deepseek, saving millions as cost pressure mounts on Anthropic

2026-06-26 · Source: The Decoder · Field: Technology & Digital — Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning, Entrepreneurship & Start-ups, Emerging Technologies & Innovation · Depth: Fundamental Awareness, quick

Summary

AI startup Lindy, a 25-person company, recently transitioned entirely from Anthropic's Claude to Deepseek, hosted by a US company, resulting in millions of dollars in savings. CEO Flo Crivello stated on June 26, 2026, that the startup's AI costs had become "unsustainable," even exceeding personnel expenses, and that the cost curve "crashed to the ground" after the switch. This move highlights mounting cost pressures on major AI providers like Anthropic and OpenAI, as companies tighten AI spending and increasingly consider more affordable alternatives. A recent analysis by Snowflake's CTO also indicated that Chinese models like GLM-5.2 are competitive with Claude on price-performance, depending on the task.

Key takeaway

For entrepreneurs or AI/ML directors managing significant cloud AI expenditures, Lindy's switch to Deepseek highlights a critical cost optimization strategy. You should actively evaluate alternative, more cost-effective models like Deepseek or GLM-5.2, especially for tasks where their price-performance ratio is competitive. This proactive assessment can yield substantial savings, potentially millions, directly impacting your business's financial viability and operational efficiency.

Key insights

AI startups are shifting to cheaper models like Deepseek to counter unsustainable costs from providers like Anthropic.

Principles

• AI operational costs can exceed personnel expenses for startups.
• Price-performance ratio is a critical factor in AI model selection.
• Cost-effective alternative AI models are gaining market traction.

In practice

• Evaluate Deepseek for potential AI cost reductions.
• Consider GLM-5.2 for tasks where price-performance is key.
• Monitor major AI provider pricing for competitive adjustments.

Topics

• AI Cost Optimization
• Deepseek
• Anthropic Claude
• AI Model Selection
• Startup Operations
• Price-Performance Ratio

Best for: CTO, VP of Engineering/Data, AI Engineer, Director of AI/ML, Entrepreneur, Investor

Related on AIssential

• How AI Customers Are Lowering Their Anthropic and OpenAI Bills — AI customers are optimizing costs by switching to cheaper models from current or alternative providers.
• Anthropic says it’s about to have its first profitable quarter — Anthropic's projected Q2 profitability and rapid revenue growth highlight intense competition and high compute costs in the AI sector.
• Breaking Down Anthropic's IPO and Nvidia — The AI industry is rapidly diversifying with new models, hardware, and business models emerging across various sectors.
• AI News: Everyone's Mad At Anthropic Now — Open-source AI models are rapidly closing the performance gap with proprietary models while offering significant cost and privacy advantages.
• anthropic vs. openai — Anthropic has surpassed OpenAI in new enterprise AI adoption, driven by targeted technical focus and broader non-technical applications.
• MLWhiz Weekly Recsys/ML/GenAI Newsletter # 9 - The week AI started its IPOs — The AI industry is rapidly maturing, transitioning to public markets while new models and research advance core capabilities.

Open in AIssential →

Editorial summary, takeaway, and curation by AIssential. Original article published by The Decoder.