I Grew Up Under a Dictatorship. Now I Build AI. The Patterns Are the Same.

2026-04-01 · Source: Chris Shayan – Medium · Field: Technology & Digital — Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning, Emerging Technologies & Innovation · Depth: Intermediate, long

Summary

The author, a former Head of AI at a global banking platform, draws parallels between the structural mechanics of a dictatorship and the current trajectory of the AI industry. Recounting a childhood experience in Iran where historical narratives were quietly altered, the author identifies four stages of power consolidation: the savior narrative, silencing of alternatives, ideological moat, and economy of loyalty. Applying Thomas Sowell's "Intellectuals and Society," the author argues that the AI industry, driven by venture capital, hiring practices, and specialized language, inadvertently replicates these stages by promoting an "AI will solve everything" ideology, marginalizing dissent, and creating an ecosystem where beneficiaries are insulated from negative consequences. This leads to a brittle architecture that prioritizes expansion over critical evaluation and accountability.

Key takeaway

For Directors of AI/ML and CTOs evaluating AI strategy, recognize that unquestioning adoption creates a brittle, unaccountable system. Actively foster dissent and build mechanisms to challenge your AI thesis, ensuring your teams bear the consequences of their designs. Prioritize architectural diversity and decentralized data governance to prevent vendor lock-in and ideological capture, safeguarding against future systemic failures.

Key insights

The AI industry's structural evolution mirrors dictatorial power consolidation by eliminating alternatives and insulating beneficiaries from consequences.

Principles

• Systems immune to questioning fail catastrophically.
• Designers must experience their system's consequences.
• Institutional redundancy protects against capture.

In practice

• Build adversarial functions into AI teams.
• Actively seek feedback on AI's real-world impact.
• Implement architectural diversity with multiple models and vendors.

Topics

• AI Industry Structure
• Power Consolidation
• Intellectuals and Society
• Authoritarian System Parallels
• AI Accountability

Best for: Director of AI/ML, Entrepreneur, CTO

Related on AIssential

• From Democracies to Autocracies: How AI Systems Enable Authoritarianism by Design — AI-enabled authoritarianism is a distributed risk, stemming from design and operational choices across diverse political systems.
• The AI Atrophy Problem How CIOs Fight It — AI outputs are hypotheses, not answers; critical thinking requires human validation and stress-testing.
• 😼 AI's Biggest Problem Just Changed. Nobody's Ready. — AI's primary challenge has shifted from capability to governance and control over autonomous agents.
• Reckoning with the Political Economy of AI: Avoiding Decoys in Pursuit of Accountability — AI's perceived accountability is often an illusion, masking a deeper political economy driven by powerful, interconnected networks.
• AI vendors are trying to bridge the governance gap: For adopters, this is a risk — AI governance independence is structurally constrained when vendors provide both capability and governance.
• Agents Are Not Enough: The Next Bottleneck Is the Human Framework — Human frameworks, not agent autonomy, are the next critical bottleneck for effective and accountable AI systems.

Open in AIssential →

Editorial summary, takeaway, and curation by AIssential. Original article published by Chris Shayan – Medium.