Phonikud: Overcoming Phonetic Underspecification for Hebrew Text-To-Speech

· Source: cs.CL updates on arXiv.org · Field: Technology & Digital — Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning, Natural Language Processing & Speech · Depth: Expert, quick

Summary

Phonikud, an open-source framework, addresses the challenge of phonetic underspecification, particularly stress, in Modern Hebrew Text-to-Speech (TTS). The framework introduces four key contributions: Phonikud itself, a Hebrew grapheme-to-phoneme (G2P) system that augments a diacritizer to produce fully-specified International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA) transcriptions; the ILSpeech corpus, a new dataset featuring paired Hebrew audio, text, and expert IPA annotations; a novel benchmark for Hebrew G2P conversion, a task previously unmeasured; and Hebrew audio-to-IPA models designed to capture overlooked phonetic details for automated TTS evaluation. Experimental results demonstrate that Phonikud achieves higher accuracy in predicting Hebrew phonemes compared to existing methods. Furthermore, small, local TTS models leveraging phonetic input from Phonikud can achieve performance comparable to large proprietary systems. The code, data, and models are publicly released.

Key takeaway

For NLP Engineers developing Hebrew Text-to-Speech systems, Phonikud offers a critical advancement. You should integrate this open-source grapheme-to-phoneme system to overcome phonetic underspecification, particularly regarding stress. By doing so, you can achieve more accurate phoneme predictions and enable smaller, local TTS models to rival the performance of larger proprietary solutions. Consider using the ILSpeech corpus and the new G2P benchmark for your development and evaluation efforts.

Key insights

Fully specifying phonetic features like stress significantly improves Hebrew TTS accuracy and enables smaller models.

Principles

Method

Phonikud augments a base diacritizer to generate fully-specified IPA transcriptions for Hebrew text, then uses these as input for TTS models.

In practice

Topics

Best for: Research Scientist, AI Scientist, NLP Engineer, Machine Learning Engineer

Related on AIssential

Open in AIssential →

Editorial summary, takeaway, and curation by AIssential. Original article published by cs.CL updates on arXiv.org.