COGNAC at SemEval-2026 Task 4: Evaluating Narrative Components with LLMs for Hard Story Similarity Cases

· Source: Paper Index on ACL Anthology · Field: Technology & Digital — Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning, Natural Language Processing · Depth: Expert, medium

Summary

The COGNAC system, developed for SemEval-2026 Task 4, addresses narrative similarity by evaluating stories based on abstract theme, course of action, and outcome. For Track A, the system employs a two-stage approach: initially using majority voting from multiple large language model (LLM) judgments for high-agreement cases. Difficult, low-agreement examples are routed to a second stage that decomposes stories into their narrative components, scoring them with learned weights or comparing them via structured chain-of-thought prompting. This method achieved first place with 0.78 test accuracy. In Track B, COGNAC generated embeddings from full stories and individual components, finding that embeddings derived solely from the course-of-action component delivered the best performance, securing first place with 0.72 accuracy. Analyses also highlighted significant annotation variability in the dataset, underscoring the need to manage ambiguity in narrative similarity modeling.

Key takeaway

For NLP Engineers developing narrative understanding systems, consider adopting a multi-stage LLM approach that first handles clear cases, then decomposes difficult examples into core components like "course of action." Your models will gain robustness, especially if you prioritize embeddings derived from action sequences, as this method achieved top performance in SemEval-2026 Task 4. Be prepared to explicitly address annotation variability in your datasets to improve overall system accuracy.

Key insights

Decomposing narratives into components and using a two-stage LLM approach significantly improves story similarity evaluation.

Principles

Method

A two-stage system: majority voting by LLMs for easy cases, then component decomposition with weighted scoring or chain-of-thought prompting for difficult cases.

In practice

Topics

Best for: Research Scientist, AI Scientist, NLP Engineer

Related on AIssential

Open in AIssential →

Editorial summary, takeaway, and curation by AIssential. Original article published by Paper Index on ACL Anthology.