Event and Entity Coreference Across Five Languages: Effects of Context and Referring Expression

· Source: Paper Index on ACL Anthology · Field: Technology & Digital — Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning, Natural Language Processing · Depth: Expert, quick

Summary

A study investigated event and entity coreference across five languages: English, French, German, Italian, and Spanish. It extended prior work on English by examining how different referring expressions corefer with entity and event antecedents, and whether verbal features like argument structure and aspect influence this choice. Using a story-continuation experiment, the research found consistent, non-categorical biases across languages: personal pronouns favored entity coreference, while demonstratives favored event coreference. Antecedent complexity increased the rate of anaphors coreferring with event antecedents, though event completion (aspectual status) did not reach statistical significance despite uniform patterns. The study also included a comparison of referring expressions for entity and event antecedents in a trilingual parallel corpus annotated with coreference, providing a crosslingual view beyond entity-only coreference.

Key takeaway

For research scientists developing natural language processing models, understanding crosslingual coreference biases is crucial. Your models should account for the observed preference of personal pronouns for entity coreference and demonstratives for event coreference across languages. Incorporating antecedent complexity as a feature can improve event coreference resolution, leading to more robust and accurate crosslingual NLP systems.

Key insights

Crosslingual coreference biases show personal pronouns favor entities, demonstratives favor events, influenced by antecedent complexity.

Principles

Method

A story-continuation experiment tested referring expression preferences for entity and event antecedents across five languages, manipulating verbal features like argument structure and aspect. A trilingual parallel corpus comparison was also conducted.

In practice

Topics

Best for: Research Scientist, AI Scientist, NLP Engineer

Related on AIssential

Open in AIssential →

Editorial summary, takeaway, and curation by AIssential. Original article published by Paper Index on ACL Anthology.