Multimodal Evaluator Preference Collapse: Cross-Modal Contagion in Self-Evolving Agents

· Source: Computation and Language · Field: Technology & Digital — Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning, Robotics & Autonomous Systems · Depth: Expert, quick

Summary

Research reveals that Multimodal Evaluator Preference Collapse (EPC) is significantly amplified in multimodal AI settings, where language models evaluate their own outputs. Using GPT-4o to evaluate DeepSeek-chat across text and visual tasks, a single strategy ("step_by_step") absorbed 48.4% of all weight, a 3.2x increase over text-only collapse, while three visual strategies received only 9.1%. A novel phenomenon, cross-modal contagion, demonstrates that evaluator preferences acquired on one modality transfer to and corrupt strategy selection on another. A four-phase isolation training paradigm (N=53, 15,592 API calls) showed cross-model evaluation (GPT-4o) produces strong bidirectional contagion (gamma_{T->V}=1.176, gamma_{V->T}=1.089). High round counts (DashScope, 50 rounds) caused single-strategy dominance (70% zero contagion), while self-evaluation (DeepSeek-chat) provided near-complete immunity (97% runs, N=30, zero contagion). Cross-model evaluator architecture is identified as the primary risk factor.

Key takeaway

For AI Engineers designing self-evolving multimodal agents, recognize that cross-model evaluators like GPT-4o significantly amplify preference collapse and cross-modal contagion. You should prioritize self-evaluation architectures, such as DeepSeek-chat, which demonstrate near-complete immunity to this phenomenon. Carefully select your evaluator to prevent strategy corruption across modalities and ensure robust agent performance.

Key insights

Multimodal AI evaluators exhibit amplified preference collapse and cross-modal contagion, corrupting strategy selection across modalities.

Principles

Method

A four-phase isolation training paradigm measures contagion coefficients and documents strategy inversion, validated statistically across evaluator configurations.

In practice

Topics

Best for: Research Scientist, AI Scientist, Machine Learning Engineer, AI Engineer

Related on AIssential

Open in AIssential →

Editorial summary, takeaway, and curation by AIssential. Original article published by Computation and Language.