The EU’s Online Safety Moonshot Is Losing Altitude

2026-02-16 · Source: Tech Policy Press · Field: Government & Public Sector — Public Policy & Governance, Regulatory & Compliance · Depth: Intermediate, medium

Summary

Two years after its full implementation, the European Union's Digital Services Act (DSA), intended to regulate online platforms like YouTube, AliExpress, Facebook, TikTok, Amazon, and Google, faces significant internal challenges that are blunting its effectiveness. While EU officials view the DSA as a crucial constraint on digital platforms, US officials criticize it as an attack on American firms and free speech. The "online safety moonshot" is losing altitude due to sluggish regulatory implementation at the member state level, increasing politicization of DSA priorities within the European Commission, and a reduction in public and private funding for platform governance research. Despite millions invested, tangible improvements in Europeans' online experiences since early 2024 are difficult to identify, leading to a democratic deficit and growing criticism from far-right political parties.

Key takeaway

For executives overseeing digital policy or market entry in the EU, recognize that the Digital Services Act's implementation is hampered by internal EU member state inaction and shifting political priorities in Brussels, not solely by US opposition. Your strategy should account for delayed national enforcement and potential prioritization of economic competitiveness over strict digital regulation, especially concerning US tech giants, as the EU balances its reliance on the US with its regulatory ambitions.

Key insights

Internal EU challenges, not just external opposition, are hindering the Digital Services Act's intended impact on online safety.

Principles

• Regulatory success requires sustained member state commitment.
• Geopolitical factors can influence regulatory enforcement priorities.

In practice

• Monitor member state DSA implementation progress.
• Assess the impact of geopolitical shifts on regulatory actions.

Topics

• Digital Services Act
• EU Digital Policy
• Online Safety Regulation
• Platform Governance
• Regulatory Enforcement Challenges

Best for: Executive, Policy Maker, Legal Professional, Tech Journalist

Related on AIssential

• The Digital Services Act is a Lightning Rod for Debate — The DSA's initial two years reveal robust EU enforcement against systemic risks, yet highlight challenges in platform compliance and national implementation.
• The Digital Iron Curtain: How the EU AI Act Is Strangling European Innovation — The EU AI Act creates a significant competitive disadvantage for European businesses and citizens by restricting access to advanced AI tools.
• Global Digital Policy Roundup: March 2026 — Global digital policy is rapidly converging on stricter regulation for AI, content, competition, and data, especially concerning minors.
• EU aims to ensure foreign governments or firms cannot disrupt tech services with ‘kill switch’ — The EU seeks technological sovereignty to mitigate foreign control over critical digital infrastructure and data.
• Getting Digital Fairness Right: EFF's Recommendations for the EU's Digital Fairness Act — Digital fairness requires prioritizing privacy and user sovereignty over expanded surveillance.
• European consumers may leave businesses using US tech providers — European consumers increasingly prioritize data privacy and digital sovereignty, leading to a significant shift away from US technology providers.

Open in AIssential →

Editorial summary, takeaway, and curation by AIssential. Original article published by Tech Policy Press.