Ellat at SemEval-2026 Task 11: Comparing Encoder and Decoder Models for Syllogistic Reasoning
Summary
Team Ellat investigated language models' ability to assess logical validity independently of semantic plausibility for SemEval-2026 Task 11 (Subtask 1: English). The study evaluated three architectures: MiniLM-L6-mnli-binary, DeBERTa-v3-small, and Llama 3.1-8B-Instruct. Researchers applied task-specific fine-tuning for encoder models and Abstract Logic Augmentation with QLoRA for LLaMA. DeBERTa-v3-small achieved the strongest overall performance, while MiniLM-L6-mnli-binary showed clear reductions in content bias after fine-tuning. Llama 3.1-8B-Instruct exhibited strong plausibility bias in a zero-shot setting. Although fine-tuning and abstraction-based augmentation reduced plausibility bias, fully separating logical validity from semantic content remains challenging across all tested architectures, with augmented fine-tuning yielding only modest improvements.
Key takeaway
For NLP Engineers evaluating language models for formal logical reasoning, recognize that separating logical validity from semantic plausibility remains a significant challenge. While fine-tuning encoder models like MiniLM-L6-mnli-binary can reduce content bias, and Abstract Logic Augmentation with QLoRA offers modest improvements for decoder models like Llama 3.1-8B-Instruct, zero-shot performance often exhibits strong plausibility bias. You should prioritize architectures and fine-tuning strategies that explicitly target structural reasoning over semantic shortcuts to mitigate this inherent limitation.
Key insights
Language models struggle to separate logical validity from semantic plausibility, even with fine-tuning and augmentation.
Principles
- LMs often rely on world knowledge and semantic shortcuts.
- Fine-tuning can reduce content bias in encoder models.
- Zero-shot LMs exhibit strong plausibility bias.
Method
Evaluated MiniLM-L6-mnli-binary, DeBERTa-v3-small, and Llama 3.1-8B-Instruct. Applied task-specific fine-tuning for encoders and Abstract Logic Augmentation with QLoRA for LLaMA to assess syllogistic reasoning.
In practice
- Fine-tune encoder models to reduce content bias.
- Augment decoder models with QLoRA for logic tasks.
- Be aware of strong plausibility bias in zero-shot LMs.
Topics
- Syllogistic Reasoning
- Language Model Evaluation
- Encoder Models
- Decoder Models
- Fine-tuning
- Plausibility Bias
Best for: Research Scientist, AI Scientist, Machine Learning Engineer, NLP Engineer
Related on AIssential
Editorial summary, takeaway, and curation by AIssential. Original article published by Paper Index on ACL Anthology.