UTS at PsyDefDetect: Multi-Agent Councils and Absence-Based Reasoning for Defense Mechanism Classification

· Source: Paper Index on ACL Anthology · Field: Technology & Digital — Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning, Natural Language Processing · Depth: Expert, medium

Summary

Galat and Rizoiu's system for classifying psychological defense mechanisms in emotional support dialogues secured second place (F1 0.406) among 64 teams in the PsyDefDetect shared task. A core principle of their approach is that defense mechanisms are characterized by absence, such as missing affect or denied reality. This insight is translated into prompt-level clinical rules, which model an affect-cognition integration spectrum and contributed the largest F1 gain of +11.4 percentage points. The system's architecture features a multi-phase deliberative council of Gemini 2.5 agents, where advocates assess evidence strength for specific classes, achieving an F1 of 0.382 without fine-tuning. Despite this, the council exhibited a systematic "L7 attractor," leading to 59–80% incorrect predictions for minority classes. To address this, a targeted override ensemble, comprising three fine-tuned Qwen3.5 models, applies 16 overrides, adding +2.4 percentage points to the F1 score. This ensemble is managed by a multi-agent system including a builder, critic, and regression guard.

Key takeaway

For NLP Engineers developing systems for psychological text analysis, particularly when classifying nuanced or minority defense mechanisms, you should consider integrating absence-based reasoning into your prompt engineering. Your multi-agent architectures, like the Gemini 2.5 council, can achieve strong baseline performance, but be prepared to implement targeted override ensembles with fine-tuned models, such as Qwen3.5, to mitigate systematic biases against minority classes and significantly improve overall F1 scores.

Key insights

Defense mechanisms are defined by what is absent, which can be modeled for classification.

Principles

Method

A multi-phase deliberative council of Gemini 2.5 agents rates evidence, followed by a Qwen3.5 override ensemble selected by a builder, critic, and regression guard system.

In practice

Topics

Best for: AI Scientist, NLP Engineer, Research Scientist

Related on AIssential

Open in AIssential →

Editorial summary, takeaway, and curation by AIssential. Original article published by Paper Index on ACL Anthology.