Towards Unified and Data-Efficient Prognostics and Health Management with Tabular Foundation Models

· Source: cs.AI updates on arXiv.org · Field: Technology & Digital — Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning, Data Science & Analytics, Robotics & Autonomous Systems · Depth: Advanced, extended

Summary

Data-driven Prognostics and Health Management (PHM) uses time-varying condition-monitoring data to diagnose system states and estimate remaining useful life in engineered assets. This work proposes a framework applying Tabular Foundation Models (TFMs) to industrial time series via in-context learning, converting raw unit-level signals into tabular rows. The evaluation compares TFMs (TabPFN, TabDPT) against sequence models and gradient-boosted trees across 12 PHM datasets for prognostics and diagnostics. Results indicate TFMs achieve the best average ranks (TabDPT 2.67, TabPFN 3.33 for prognostics; both 2.33 for diagnostics). TabPFN excelled on PHME20 (1.95 \u00b1 0.03 MAE) and Unibo (3.72 \u00b1 0.06 MAE), and TabDPT on N-CMAPSS Prognostics (6.85 \u00b1 0.02 MAE). TFMs demonstrated high data efficiency, performing competitively with 1-10% of training data, and robustness to missing values, with performance improving with increased sequence length on some datasets.

Key takeaway

For AI/ML engineers developing PHM solutions, consider Tabular Foundation Models (TFMs) like TabPFN or TabDPT. These models offer strong performance, data efficiency, and robustness to missing values across prognostics and diagnostics tasks. You can achieve competitive results with limited labeled data by leveraging their in-context learning capabilities. Ensure your context sets are distributionally rich to maximize TFM effectiveness.

Key insights

Tabular Foundation Models, via tabularization and in-context learning, offer a data-efficient and robust solution for diverse industrial PHM tasks.

Principles

Method

A unified pipeline transforms raw PHM time-series into aligned feature-target sequences, then into flattened tabular samples (\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7X_m\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7) for TFM inference, ensuring consistent evaluation across model types.

In practice

Topics

Code references

Best for: AI Engineer, Research Scientist, Machine Learning Engineer, AI Scientist, Director of AI/ML

Related on AIssential

Open in AIssential →

Editorial summary, takeaway, and curation by AIssential. Original article published by cs.AI updates on arXiv.org.