[D] Accepted ICCV25 workshop paper somehow never made it into proceedings

2026-03-22 · Source: Machine Learning · Field: Technology & Digital — Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning · Depth: Fundamental Awareness, quick

Summary

A research group's paper, accepted to an ICCV25 workshop, presented, and with completed copyright transfer and registration, was inexplicably omitted from the official proceedings. Upon inquiry, the ICCV workshop group stated the paper was removed for being "not registered," a claim contradicted by the group's documentation, with no further explanation provided. The original poster is seeking advice on who holds the authority to resolve such a publication dispute, including the workshop organizers, main conference, CVF, or IEEE/CPS, and how to formally escalate the issue. A responder questioned if the full proceedings have been entirely released, suggesting volumes might be published slowly.

Key takeaway

An accepted ICCV25 workshop paper was inexplicably omitted from official proceedings despite confirmed registration and presentation. Organizers provided a contradictory "not registered" reason without explanation, leaving authors without a publication record. This incident underscores the critical need for AI/ML researchers to understand formal escalation channels (CVF, IEEE/CPS) to resolve such academic publishing failures.

Topics

• ICCV25 Workshop
• Academic Publishing
• Conference Proceedings
• Paper Registration
• Publication Disputes

Best for: AI Scientist, AI Researcher, Research Scientist

Related on AIssential

• [D] When to submit to a workshop and how much are top tier conference workshop papers worth? — Workshop submissions are common for papers rejected from main conferences, offering a publication path.
• Anyone here with experience submitting to Nature Machine Intelligence? [R] — Nature Machine Intelligence (NMI) is suitable for interdisciplinary ML-for-Science papers, requiring source code transparency.
• A key science publishing platform is cracking down on AI slop — arXiv's ban on AI-error papers highlights the challenge of maintaining research quality amidst rising AI-generated content.
• Looking for arXiv cs endorsement — first-time submitter, paper on multi-agent LLM token optimization (Patent Pending) [D] — A first-time submitter sought arXiv cs endorsement for a patent-pending paper on multi-agent LLM token optimization.
• Please follow the rules for ARR/ACL papers — Adherence to publication guidelines is crucial for research quality and reviewer efficiency.
• The peer review system is breaking down. Here’s how we can fix it — The voluntary peer review system is failing due to unacknowledged labor and increased academic pressures.

Open in AIssential →

Editorial summary, takeaway, and curation by AIssential. Original article published by Machine Learning.