Elon Musk tried to hire OpenAI founders to start AI unit inside Tesla

2026-05-07 · Source: AI - Ars Technica · Field: Technology & Digital — Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning, Emerging Technologies & Innovation · Depth: Fundamental Awareness, short

Summary

Elon Musk attempted to integrate OpenAI's founding team, including Sam Altman, Greg Brockman, and Ilya Sutskever, into Tesla in 2018 to lead a new AI lab. This proposal emerged as OpenAI's leaders debated the company's control and strategic direction, with Musk suggesting Altman join Tesla's board or OpenAI become a Tesla subsidiary. Court evidence from a lawsuit filed by Musk against OpenAI reveals that by late 2017, Musk doubted OpenAI's non-profit structure could achieve artificial general intelligence (AGI) and explored building his own AI capabilities within Tesla. Shivon Zilis, an OpenAI adviser and board member, facilitated discussions and outlined scenarios, including poaching DeepMind's Demis Hassabis, to secure capital for OpenAI while maintaining its non-profit mission. Ultimately, OpenAI's executives rejected Musk's proposals, leading to his departure from the board and the company's subsequent restructuring into a for-profit entity with a charitable arm.

Key takeaway

For investors evaluating AI startups, this case underscores the critical importance of clear governance structures and founder agreements from inception. Early disagreements over control and commercialization, as seen with Musk and OpenAI, can lead to significant legal challenges and impact long-term valuation. Ensure robust legal frameworks are in place to prevent future disputes over company direction and profit distribution, especially when transitioning from non-profit to for-profit models.

Key insights

Musk's 2018 attempt to absorb OpenAI into Tesla highlights early conflicts over control and commercialization of AGI development.

Principles

• Early strategic decisions shape long-term organizational structure.
• Founder alignment is critical for company direction and funding.

Method

OpenAI's founders explored various organizational structures, including acquisition by Tesla or poaching key talent, to secure capital for AGI development.

In practice

• Consider founder motivations when evaluating early-stage ventures.
• Assess potential conflicts of interest in multi-company leadership roles.

Topics

• Elon Musk
• OpenAI
• Tesla AI Lab
• Artificial General Intelligence
• Sam Altman

Best for: Tech Journalist, Investor, Director of AI/ML

Related on AIssential

• Musk and Altman face off in court over OpenAI's for-profit pivot — The Musk-Altman trial centers on OpenAI's for-profit pivot, with both sides presenting conflicting narratives of its founding.
• How Elon Musk Squeezed OpenAI: They ‘Are Gonna Want to Kill Me’ — Elon Musk's legal battle with OpenAI centers on a 2017 power struggle, funding, and personnel disputes.
• “Maybe OpenAI Should Go to My Kids” – Elon Musk — OpenAI's leadership defended its for-profit transition and criticized Elon Musk's vision and management style in court.
• Opinion | What Would Jefferson and Madison Make of Musk and Altman? — Founder disputes over corporate structure and mission can lead to high-stakes legal battles in the AI sector.
• Elon Musk Seemingly Admits xAI Has Used OpenAI’s Models to Train Its Own — Elon Musk indicated xAI may have used OpenAI models for training, revealing AI industry competitive tensions.
• Elon Musk loses trial against OpenAI — Elon Musk lost a legal challenge against OpenAI, a company he co-founded.

Open in AIssential →

Editorial summary, takeaway, and curation by AIssential. Original article published by AI - Ars Technica.