Speech Disfluencies and LLM Confidence: Length Bias and Pragmatic Insensitivity in Brazilian Portuguese

· Source: Paper Index on ACL Anthology · Field: Technology & Digital — Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning, Data Science & Analytics · Depth: Expert, quick

Summary

A pilot study investigated how speech disfluencies, such as filled pauses and repetitions, influence the confidence of the Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct Large Language Model in Brazilian Portuguese. Researchers used 344 turns from the Roda Viva corpus, comparing faithful Conversation Analysis transcriptions with sanitized versions. The study found that the model's confidence is overwhelmingly driven by turn length (${\beta_{\text{std}}} = +14.47, p 0.001$), rather than by pragmatic markers of uncertainty (${\beta_{\text{oral}}} = -3.09, {\beta_{\text{hedges}}} = -0.97$, both non-significant). While disfluency markers showed a human-expected directional effect after controlling for length, this was dwarfed by the length bias. This surface-feature dominance explains the model's "pragmatic blindness" and the substantial divergence observed via ECE (41.95) and OE (4.29) between the two transcription conditions.

Key takeaway

For NLP Engineers developing LLMs for spontaneous speech applications, recognize that your model's confidence may be heavily biased by turn length rather than actual pragmatic uncertainty. If you are evaluating LLM reliability on oral language, consider explicitly controlling for surface features like length. This finding suggests a need to fine-tune models on disfluency-rich corpora to improve their pragmatic sensitivity and ensure more accurate confidence alignment in real-world conversational AI systems.

Key insights

LLM confidence in spontaneous speech is primarily driven by turn length, not pragmatic uncertainty markers.

Principles

Method

The study contrasted faithful Conversation Analysis transcriptions with sanitized versions of spontaneous speech, applying binned divergence metrics, rank correlation, and multivariate regression.

In practice

Topics

Best for: Research Scientist, AI Scientist, NLP Engineer

Related on AIssential

Open in AIssential →

Editorial summary, takeaway, and curation by AIssential. Original article published by Paper Index on ACL Anthology.