A Comparative Study on the Impact of Traditional Learning and Interactive Learning on Students' Academic Performance and Emotional Well-Being

2026-04-20 · Source: cs.AI updates on arXiv.org · Field: Education & Learning — Educational Technology (EdTech), Academic Research & Higher Education, Educational Psychology & Learning Sciences · Depth: Expert, quick

Summary

A study involving 100 university students in a computer intrusion detection course compared the impact of traditional versus interactive learning methods on academic performance and emotional well-being. Participants were randomly divided into two groups: one receiving traditional lectures and notes, and the other utilizing interactive tools like Kahoot, Panopto, Slido, Quizizz, Padlet, and educational videos. Academic achievement was measured via pre-tests, post-tests, final exams, and assignments, while engagement and emotional states were assessed using Likert-scale questionnaires. The interactive learning group significantly outperformed the traditional group in post-tests (67.48% vs. 53.36%) and final exams (80.8% vs. 61.44%). Interactive learners also showed higher behavioral (+67.01%) and emotional engagement (+75.32%), increased positive emotions (+66.67%), and reduced frustration, though a 39.8% drop in cognitive involvement suggested potential cognitive overload.

Key takeaway

For educators designing computer science curricula, integrating interactive learning tools is crucial for improving student outcomes. Your students are likely to achieve higher academic scores and experience better emotional well-being, as demonstrated by significant gains in post-test and final exam results. However, monitor for signs of cognitive overload, such as reduced cognitive involvement, to ensure a balanced and effective learning experience.

Key insights

Interactive learning significantly boosts academic performance and emotional well-being, but may risk cognitive overload.

Principles

• Interactive tools enhance student engagement.
• Balanced stimulation prevents cognitive overload.

Method

This study compared traditional lectures with interactive tools (Kahoot, Panopto, Slido, Quizizz, Padlet, videos) on 100 university students, measuring academic performance and emotional well-being.

In practice

• Integrate Kahoot or Quizizz for active recall.
• Use Panopto or Slido for interactive lectures.

Topics

• Interactive Learning
• Academic Performance
• Emotional Well-being
• Student Engagement
• Cognitive Overload

Best for: Research Scientist, AI Scientist, Consultant

Related on AIssential

• I Don’t Want a Learning Dashboard for My Child — Over-quantification in education, often amplified by AI, undermines holistic learning, creativity, and meaningful human connections.
• The Power of Warm-Ups: Setting the Stage for Learning — Structured warm-ups prime student brains for learning by activating prior knowledge and reducing cognitive load.
• 5 Free AI Tools Every African Student Should Use in 2026 — Free AI tools can significantly enhance academic efficiency and quality for students facing resource constraints.
• Why Go to College? Navigating AI in Education: A Student's Perspective — Human connection, adaptability, and critical thinking remain paramount in an AI-integrated educational and professional landscape.
• AI Isn’t Lightening Workloads. It’s Making Them More Intense. — AI integration is increasing work speed and complexity, potentially leading to overload despite productivity gains.
• Beyond Passive Viewing: A Pilot Study of a Hybrid Learning Platform Augmenting Video Lectures with Conversational AI — Integrating conversational AI tutors with video lectures significantly boosts learning outcomes and engagement in online education.

Open in AIssential →

Editorial summary, takeaway, and curation by AIssential. Original article published by cs.AI updates on arXiv.org.