uir-cis at SemEval-2026 Task 12: Mitigating Prior-Induced Hallucinations in Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning via Precision-Oriented Decoding

· Source: Paper Index on ACL Anthology · Field: Technology & Digital — Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning, Natural Language Processing · Depth: Expert, medium

Summary

The uir-cis system, developed for the SemEval-2026 Task 12 on Abductive Event Reasoning (AER), addresses "over-selection" hallucinations in Instruction-tuned Large Language Models (LLMs). This pathology causes models to incorrectly prioritize semantic priors over retrieved evidence. The system employs a 32-billion parameter Qwen2.5 foundational model, fine-tuned using Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) and evaluated in a Zero-shot Chain-of-Thought (CoT) setting. To combat epistemic noise, the researchers propose a Precision-Oriented Decoding (POD) strategy, combining low-temperature sampling (T=0.45) with scaled majority voting (K=9). After a three-stage empirical development, the system achieved a score of 0.802 on the official test set. Findings indicate that suppressing epistemic noise is more effective than heuristic recall compensation in causal reasoning tasks with strict penalties for incorrect predictions.

Key takeaway

For Machine Learning Engineers developing LLM-based causal reasoning systems, you should prioritize strategies that suppress epistemic noise over those focused on recall compensation. Implement Precision-Oriented Decoding by combining low-temperature sampling (e.g., T=0.45) with scaled majority voting (e.g., K=9) to reduce "over-selection" hallucinations where models rely on priors instead of evidence. This approach demonstrably improves precision in tasks with strict penalization for incorrect predictions.

Key insights

Precision-Oriented Decoding effectively mitigates prior-induced hallucinations in LLMs for abductive event reasoning.

Principles

Method

A Precision-Oriented Decoding (POD) strategy combines low-temperature sampling (T=0.45) with scaled majority voting (K=9) on a LoRA-adapted Qwen2.5 model in a Zero-shot CoT setting.

In practice

Topics

Best for: Research Scientist, AI Engineer, AI Scientist, Machine Learning Engineer, NLP Engineer

Related on AIssential

Open in AIssential →

Editorial summary, takeaway, and curation by AIssential. Original article published by Paper Index on ACL Anthology.