Agentic Engineering and the Lost Art of Verification
Summary
Wes McKinney, Jeremiah Lowen, and Randy Olson discussed their advanced AI agent workflows and tools in a "Show Us Your Agent Skills" episode. Wes McKinney detailed his "agentic engineering" stack, including RoboRev for automated code review (using GPT 5.5 to review code 4-5 times), Agents View for session analytics, Middleman for local GitHub dashboard management, and Kata for issue tracking, processing over a billion tokens daily. Jeremiah Lowen presented his "second brain" approach, using OpenClaw to store voice memos and meeting transcripts, alongside his "explain" skill for context-aware agent communication, and Prefab, a Python DSL for generative UIs. Randy Olson demonstrated a data visualization skill that encodes Edward Tufty's principles, enabling agents to research data, generate chart variants, and refine visualizations through a "verifier loop" that acts as an LLM judge. The discussion highlighted the shift from writing and reading code to agent-driven verification and custom software development, while acknowledging challenges like agent reliability and the need for precise instruction.
Key takeaway
For AI Engineers and MLOps teams aiming to scale development and ensure code quality, integrating agentic workflows is crucial. You should implement automated code review systems like RoboRev, leveraging advanced LLMs (e.g., GPT 5.5) for rigorous, multi-pass verification of agent-generated code. Additionally, consider encoding specific design principles or human judgments into agent skills and employing "verifier loops" to iteratively refine outputs, significantly reducing manual oversight and accelerating project delivery while maintaining high standards.
Key insights
Advanced AI agents enable scalable software development, automated verification, and personalized knowledge management, shifting focus from manual coding to oversight.
Principles
- Automate code review with agents for thorough, multi-pass verification.
- Treat agent memory as a "second brain" for continuous context and knowledge accumulation.
- Encode human judgment and design principles into agent skills for consistent output.
Method
Implement a "verifier loop" where agents generate outputs (e.g., data visualizations), an LLM acts as a judge based on encoded criteria, and provides feedback for iterative refinement until quality standards are met.
In practice
- Use a daemon like RoboRev for continuous, asynchronous code review on agent-generated commits.
- Develop an "explain" skill to guide agents in providing concise, context-aware summaries of their actions.
- Create Python DSLs (e.g., Prefab) to stream generative, interactive UIs directly from agent processes.
Topics
- Agentic Engineering
- AI Agents
- Automated Code Review
- Data Visualization
- LLM Evals
- Custom Software Generation
- Workflow Automation
Best for: AI Architect, AI Engineer, Machine Learning Engineer, MLOps Engineer
Related on AIssential
See Counsel's argued verdicts on the open AI decisions leaders are weighing →
Editorial summary, takeaway, and curation by AIssential. Original article published by Vanishing Gradients.