Novotný - Philosophical Perspectives on AI Risks

2025-09-29 · Source: Blogic - John Beverley · Field: Science & Research — Social Sciences & Behavioral Studies, AI Ethics & Philosophy · Depth: Advanced, quick

Summary

Daniel D. Novotný, an NCOR affiliate at the University of South Bohemia's Center for Applied Philosophy, delivered a presentation on AI risk at the Philosophy of AI 2025 Conference in Prague. His talk explored the intersection of AI risk and ontology engineering, approaching the subject from a philosophical perspective. The presentation slides are publicly available, offering insights into the conceptual frameworks used to analyze potential dangers associated with artificial intelligence, particularly through the lens of how knowledge representation and ontological structures influence AI system behavior and safety. This work bridges abstract philosophical inquiry with concrete concerns in AI development and deployment.

Key takeaway

For AI Ethicists and Research Scientists evaluating systemic AI risks, Novotný's philosophical perspective on ontology engineering offers a crucial framework. Your understanding of how knowledge representation impacts AI safety can be deepened by considering these conceptual bridges, potentially revealing overlooked risk vectors or mitigation strategies in complex AI systems.

Key insights

AI risk analysis benefits from philosophical perspectives, especially regarding ontology engineering.

Principles

• Ontology influences AI risk.
• Philosophical inquiry informs AI safety.

Topics

• AI Risk
• Philosophy of AI
• Ontology Engineering
• Philosophical Perspectives

Best for: AI Ethicist, AI Researcher, Research Scientist

Related on AIssential

• Philosophizing about GenAi — Generative AI reconfigures existing data, challenging human creativity and posing risks from job displacement to existential threats.
• ERTS: Adversarial Robustness Testing of Ethical AI via Semantic Perturbation in a Bounded Consequence Space — ERTS provides a novel framework for adversarial robustness testing of ethical AI using semantic perturbations in a bounded consequence space.
• A philosophy of work — Work holds intrinsic value beyond pay, contributing to well-being and societal fabric.
• When Machines 'Think': Anthropomorphization in the Discourse on AI - Conceptual Risks and Proposal for a Non-Anthropomorphic Lexicon for NLP in Portuguese — Anthropomorphic language in AI discourse creates conceptual misunderstandings and misrepresents system capabilities.
• Three Labs With a Plan and A Memorandum — AI policy and development strategies reveal fundamental philosophical divides on control, safety, and power distribution among key actors.
• When Should We Protect AI? A Precautionary Framework for Consciousness Uncertainty — A framework links AI consciousness evidence to graduated protective obligations using five welfare dimensions.

Open in AIssential →

Editorial summary, takeaway, and curation by AIssential. Original article published by Blogic - John Beverley.