Autorelevance function and other feature relevance measures for univariate time series

· Source: Machine Learning · Field: Technology & Digital — Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning, Data Science & Analytics · Depth: Expert, quick

Summary

A new model-agnostic methodology is introduced for measuring lag relevance in machine learning forecasting models applied to univariate time series. This approach leverages Ghost variables, Shapley values, and additive importance measures to define "auto-relevance" and "partial auto-relevance" functions, which quantify lag importance. The authors also propose a novel technique for coalition-based methods, replacing absent features with a one-step forecast derived from the same model. This combined framework is specifically designed for time series analysis. The methodology's effectiveness was evaluated through various simulations and real-world data cases, utilizing models from the seasonal ARMA family and recurrent neural networks. The relevance measures consistently demonstrated the expected lag structure across nearly all test scenarios.

Key takeaway

For Machine Learning Engineers developing univariate time series forecasting models, understanding lag relevance is crucial for model interpretability and feature engineering. You should consider implementing the proposed auto-relevance and partial auto-relevance functions to quantify the importance of historical data points. This approach offers a model-agnostic way to identify significant lags, potentially improving feature selection and model performance, especially when working with complex models like recurrent neural networks.

Key insights

A model-agnostic framework quantifies lag relevance in univariate time series forecasting using novel auto-relevance functions.

Principles

Method

The methodology combines Ghost variables, Shapley values, and additive importance measures to define auto-relevance and partial auto-relevance functions for lag importance. Absent features in coalition methods are replaced with a one-step forecast from the same model.

In practice

Topics

Best for: Research Scientist, AI Scientist, Machine Learning Engineer, Data Scientist

Related on AIssential

Open in AIssential →

Editorial summary, takeaway, and curation by AIssential. Original article published by Machine Learning.