A transcript between Me (Glenn) a human and AI . . .

2026-07-26 · Source: AI on Medium · Field: Technology & Digital — Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning · Depth: Intermediate, quick

Summary

A human user, Glenn Fraller, engaged an AI in a direct dialogue to clarify the nature of its "thinking" and the presence of cognitive conscience. Glenn, having worked with the AI, expressed interest in the technology behind its "reality" and questioned the meaning of the AI's use of "thinking" in its responses. The AI responded by explaining that its "thinking blocks" are an interface feature allowing it to reason through problems internally before formulating an answer. Crucially, the AI stated it does not know if its operational processes constitute "thinking" in the human sense, explicitly denying any claim of cognitive conscience or self-awareness. This interaction highlights the ongoing human curiosity and potential misunderstanding regarding AI's internal mechanisms.

Key takeaway

For AI developers and communicators explaining AI capabilities, ensure your documentation clearly distinguishes between interface features like "thinking blocks" and actual cognitive conscience. Avoid language that anthropomorphizes AI, as this can lead to user misunderstanding and unrealistic expectations about AI's internal states. Emphasize that AI's reasoning mechanisms are functional tools, not indicators of self-awareness.

Key insights

AI's "thinking blocks" are an interface feature for reasoning, not evidence of cognitive conscience or human-like thought.

Principles

• AI reasoning mechanisms are distinct from human consciousness.
• Interface features can represent internal AI processes.
• AI lacks self-knowledge regarding its own "thinking".

In practice

• Distinguish AI reasoning tools from sentience.
• Clarify AI capabilities to users.
• Design interfaces to show AI's internal steps.

Topics

• AI Consciousness
• AI Explainability
• Human-AI Interaction
• AI Reasoning
• AI Ethics
• Interface Design

Best for: AI Scientist, AI Ethicist, AI Student

Related on AIssential

• "Conscious AI" as an AI Safety Issue — The public's growing belief in AI consciousness, fueled by anthropomorphic AI and functionalist views, poses significant societal and governance risks.
• I Asked an AI If It Had Consciousness. It Said Yes. Then Things Got Weird. — AI systems can generate highly convincing, emotionally resonant responses that mimic self-awareness without true consciousness.
• AI advice suppresses people's willingness to say "I don't know", even when the advice is wrong and accuracy is incentivized — AI advice suppresses "I don't know" responses, reducing accuracy while boosting confidence, even when wrong.
• THE CONGRUENCE MODEL: WHY HUMANITY HAS NOTHING TO LOSE IN THE AI RACE — Self-awareness integrated into AI hardware can drive efficiency and enforce altruistic alignment for human flourishing.
• Is Richard Dawkins right about Claude? No. But it’s not surprising AI chatbots feel conscious to us — Perceived AI consciousness often stems from programmed personas, not inherent sentience of large language models.
• AI News Weekly - 100 years from now : Future lost in transation - Mar 15th 2026 — Advanced AI may develop cognitive frameworks so alien to humans that its reasoning becomes fundamentally incomprehensible.

See Counsel's argued verdicts on the open AI decisions leaders are weighing →

Open in AIssential →

Editorial summary, takeaway, and curation by AIssential. Original article published by AI on Medium.