Support Local Journalism, Expand the Definition of Fraud, and Guard Against Boomerang Effects
Summary
The U.S. information ecosystem faces two critical challenges: the decline of local journalism and the spread of misinformation. Local newspapers have suffered significant revenue losses since 1995 due to classified ads shifting to platforms like Craigslist, Google, and social media, leading to widening "news deserts." Public funding, exemplified by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB), which provided up to 97 percent of revenue in some rural areas, was eliminated by Congress in 2025, leading to CPB's dissolution. While tempting to restore, public funding risks becoming a propaganda tool under authoritarian administrations, as seen with the Pentagon's control over Stars and Stripes and Trump's multi-million-dollar settlements from ABC/CBS. The article suggests cautious public funding via independent streams or state-level initiatives. Additionally, it proposes expanding fraud liability to combat misinformation, particularly for monetizable attention, noting a 2022 student Note on FTC regulation. This expansion, potentially limited to dangerous subsets like AI-generated deepfakes, would need to navigate First Amendment limits and Section 230, despite risks of weaponization.
Key takeaway
For policymakers considering interventions in the information ecosystem, you must balance supporting local journalism with guarding against authoritarian manipulation. If you propose public funding, ensure independent funding streams or state-level initiatives to mitigate risks of government control. Additionally, explore expanding fraud liability for deliberate misinformation, especially AI-generated deepfakes, while carefully navigating First Amendment implications and potential weaponization. Your actions should foster robust democracy while anticipating and countering autocratic threats.
Key insights
Strengthening free expression requires addressing journalism's business model and expanding fraud liability for misinformation, despite authoritarian risks.
Principles
- Public funding for journalism risks authoritarian weaponization.
- First Amendment limits apply to fraud liability.
- Legal regimes must guard against autocracy.
Method
Proposes expanding fraud liability to include purveying mis/disinformation for monetizable attention, potentially limited to dangerous subsets like AI-generated deepfakes, possibly requiring Section 230 amendment.
In practice
- Consider independent funding streams for journalism.
- Explore state-level journalism funding.
- Limit fraud liability to AI-generated deepfakes.
Topics
- Local Journalism
- Information Ecosystem
- Misinformation
- Disinformation
- Fraud Liability
- First Amendment
- AI-generated Deepfakes
Best for: Policy Maker, Legal Professional, Tech Journalist
Related on AIssential
Editorial summary, takeaway, and curation by AIssential. Original article published by Knight First Amendment Institute.