WSE Research at BEA 2026 Shared Task 2: Multi-Strategy Rubric-Based Short Answer Scoring for German
Summary
The WSE Research system, developed for the BEA 2026 Shared Task 2 on Rubric-based Short Answer Scoring for German, integrates multiple strategies. It combines rubric-conditioned prompting, TF-IDF exemplar retrieval, LoRA fine-tuning of open-source Qwen models, and prediction aggregation. On the ALICE-LP-1.0 trial set, a fine-tuned Qwen2.5-32B achieved a QWK score of 0.769, surpassing the Gemini 3 Flash commercial baseline's 0.748. The system secured second place on three tracks and third on one track in the official test set. These results indicate that rubric-conditioned fine-tuning offers a competitive and cost-effective alternative to commercial APIs for German short answer scoring, with aggregation benefiting seen questions, while larger single models generalize better to unseen rubrics.
Key takeaway
For NLP Engineers developing German short answer scoring systems, consider fine-tuning open-source models like Qwen with rubric-conditioned data. Your approach can achieve competitive performance, potentially exceeding commercial APIs, while being more cost-effective. Implement prediction aggregation for improved accuracy on familiar question types, but prioritize larger single models for better generalization to novel rubrics.
Key insights
Fine-tuning open-source models with multi-strategy approaches can outperform commercial APIs for rubric-based short answer scoring.
Principles
- Rubric-conditioned fine-tuning is cost-effective.
- Aggregation aids seen questions.
- Larger models generalize better to unseen rubrics.
Method
The system combines rubric-conditioned prompting, TF-IDF exemplar retrieval, LoRA fine-tuning of Qwen models, and prediction aggregation across complementary scorers.
In practice
- Fine-tune Qwen models for German short answer scoring.
- Employ prediction aggregation for known question types.
Topics
- Short Answer Scoring
- German NLP
- Rubric-based Grading
- Qwen Models
- LoRA Fine-tuning
- Prediction Aggregation
Best for: Research Scientist, AI Scientist, Machine Learning Engineer, NLP Engineer
Related on AIssential
Editorial summary, takeaway, and curation by AIssential. Original article published by Paper Index on ACL Anthology.