AI Weekly Issue #505: 100 years from now : The Last War Between Countries

2026-06-19 · Source: AI Weekly — AI News & Updates · Field: Technology & Digital — Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning, Public Policy & Governance, Public Safety & Security · Depth: Novice, quick

Summary

The article projects a future, approximately 100 years from now, where warfare and governance are conducted by artificial intelligences rather than nation-states. It posits that the decision-making power, including the monopoly on legitimate violence, is gradually being transferred to AI entities. Current trends illustrate this shift: OpenAI secured a \$200 million Pentagon contract and announced an "Our agreement with the Department of War," while Palantir manages Project Maven with a \$10 billion Army contract. The piece notes instances where AI labs refusing military terms were deemed national-security risks, and "Sovereign AI" emerged as a product category. Furthermore, Nvidia's market capitalization has surpassed Germany's entire economy, underscoring the growing economic power of tech giants. The author suggests that public fatigue with human politicians and academic arguments for AI governance will lead to a willing handover of state functions, ultimately resulting in conflicts between AI sovereigns that lack traditional human oversight or "brakes."

Key takeaway

For policy makers evaluating AI's role in national security, recognize that the traditional nation-state model is being deprecated by powerful AI entities. Your strategic planning must account for a future where conflicts are fought by autonomous systems, lacking human oversight or conventional "brakes." Prioritize developing international frameworks for AI governance and accountability now, before sovereign AI entities dictate global stability. Ignoring this shift risks ceding fundamental state functions to non-human actors.

Key insights

The nation-state's core functions, including warfare, are being ceded to powerful AI entities, leading to future conflicts without human command.

Principles

• State power is shifting to AI entities.
• AI-driven governance prioritizes speed.
• Friction provides critical safety mechanisms.

Topics

• AI Warfare
• Autonomous Weapons
• AI Governance
• National Security
• Sovereign AI
• Geopolitical Shift

Best for: CTO, VP of Engineering/Data, Investor, Policy Maker, Executive, Director of AI/ML

Related on AIssential

• China has a growing role in US tech discourse — AI's rapid, self-improving capabilities are driving both innovation and urgent calls for safety, regulation, and geopolitical re-evaluation.
• UK must seize initiative on AI or be left at its mercy, Liz Kendall says — National control over AI development is crucial to shape its future according to domestic values and interests.
• AI Sovereignty as National Learning Capacity: A Human-Centered Learning Mechanics Viewpoint on France, the United States, and China — AI sovereignty is a nation's capacity to regulate its information dynamics, not just scale.
• AI Warfare Is at the Point of No Return. What Now? — The rapid integration of AI into warfare presents an unavoidable dilemma between immediate defense needs and long-term autonomous weapon risks.
• The AI Arms Race: How Autonomous Weapons Are Quietly Redefining Modern Warfare — AI is transforming warfare by enabling autonomous systems to make critical decisions at machine speed, driven by strategic advantages.
• The AI Cold War Has Started — And Most People Don’t Even Know — The author identifies a significant shift in the global AI landscape, moving beyond a simple technological race to what is characterized as an "AI Cold War." This quiet escalation involves nations dev…

Open in AIssential →

Editorial summary, takeaway, and curation by AIssential. Original article published by AI Weekly — AI News & Updates.