How Shakespeare’s The Tempest can help readers understand the hidden costs of AI

2026-07-07 · Source: Artificial intelligence (AI) – The Conversation · Field: Technology & Digital — Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning, AI Ethics & Societal Impact, Environmental Impact of Technology · Depth: Fundamental Awareness, short

Summary

The article uses Shakespeare's "The Tempest" as a lens to interpret the hidden costs and power dynamics of artificial intelligence infrastructure. It highlights how AI data centers are energy and resource-intensive, often situated in rural or marginalized regions, drawing parallels to colonial practices. For instance, a proposed Mvskoke Technology and Innovation Park (NCA 25-077) in eastern Oklahoma was voted down by the Mvskoke Nation due to concerns over water usage and land sovereignty, framing AI development as an extractive endeavor. The analysis compares Prospero's magical control in "The Tempest" to modern AI systems, which extract labor and transform knowledge into outputs that obscure their human and environmental origins. It argues that AI expansion creates environmental strain and labor market disruption, concentrating power in a few corporations. The piece concludes that challenging these dynamics requires community assertion of sovereignty and accountability, rather than relying on corporate goodwill, to ensure AI development benefits communities.

Key takeaway

For policy makers and community leaders evaluating AI infrastructure projects, recognize that these developments often replicate extractive colonial models. Your decisions must prioritize community wellbeing and land sovereignty over corporate gain. Actively challenge proposals that obscure environmental or social costs, and empower local communities to assert control over their digital futures. This approach ensures AI development is equitable and accountable, preventing unintended long-term burdens.

Key insights

AI infrastructure replicates colonial power dynamics, demanding community resistance for equitable development.

Principles

• AI infrastructure is resource-intensive.
• Power in AI is often obscured.
• Community action drives change.

In practice

• Scrutinize AI data center proposals.
• Demand accountability from corporations.
• Assert community land sovereignty.

Topics

• AI Infrastructure
• Data Centers
• Colonialism
• Indigenous Sovereignty
• Environmental Impact
• The Tempest

Best for: CTO, VP of Engineering/Data, Director of AI/ML, AI Ethicist, Policy Maker, General Interest

Related on AIssential

• Canada’s AI strategy must reckon with the environmental implications of data centres — AI's material resource demands, especially for data centers, are substantial and often obscured by the "cloud" metaphor, necessitating critical environmental consideration.
• How AI Hype Masks the Exploitation of African Workers — AI hype masks digital colonial extractivism, exploiting African workers through precarious micro-tasking for LLM training.
• Sovereignty — Digital sovereignty, often co-opted by states and Big Tech, can be reframed as a bottom-up, community-led movement.
• Four Experts on the Questions We Should Be Asking About AI Right Now — AI's evolving impact necessitates proactive, cross-sectoral collaboration to address long-term societal changes, equitable benefits, knowledge integrity, and information overload.
• Beyond Impact Lingo: Questioning, Concretizing, Building — AI "impact lingo" often masks environmental exploitation, exclusion, and imperialism, necessitating critical reframing.
• ‘No accountability, no checks and balances, no responsibility’: how Indigenous peoples think about AI — Indigenous perspectives reveal AI's potential to exacerbate existing inequalities and erode trust without proper accountability and cultural integration.

Open in AIssential →

Editorial summary, takeaway, and curation by AIssential. Original article published by Artificial intelligence (AI) – The Conversation.