Multi-Sourced, Multi-Agent Evidence Retrieval for Fact-Checking

· Source: cs.AI updates on arXiv.org · Field: Technology & Digital — Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning, Data Science & Analytics · Depth: Advanced, extended

Summary

The Web-enhanced Knowledge Graph retrieval Fact-Checking agentic framework (WKGFC) addresses misinformation by integrating structured knowledge graphs (KGs) with unstructured web content for evidence retrieval. Developed by Shuzhi Gong, Richard Sinnott, and Jianzhong Qi in 2026, WKGFC utilizes an LLM-enabled agent to assess claims and retrieve relevant knowledge subgraphs, augmenting them with web content when KG evidence is insufficient. This process is formalized as a Markov Decision Process (MDP), where a reasoning LLM agent adaptively decides retrieval actions. The framework employs prompt optimization to fine-tune the agent's policy without modifying base LLM parameters. Extensive experiments across Wikipedia, web, and article summary datasets show WKGFC outperforms several advanced fact-checking methods by over 5% in balanced accuracy, achieving an overall 74.3% balanced accuracy, demonstrating the effectiveness of its knowledge-centric, multi-source approach.

Key takeaway

For research scientists developing robust fact-checking systems, WKGFC demonstrates that integrating knowledge graphs with web retrieval via an adaptive LLM agent significantly improves veracity prediction. You should consider adopting a Markov Decision Process framework for evidence acquisition and implement self-reflection with prompt optimization to enhance retrieval coordination and decision-making without costly model fine-tuning, especially for open-world scenarios with incomplete evidence.

Key insights

WKGFC unifies structured KGs and web evidence via an LLM agent for adaptive, self-improving fact-checking.

Principles

Method

An LLM agent, operating as a POMDP, performs initial KG retrieval, then adaptively expands the KG or triggers web search, and finally makes a veracity verdict. Policy improvement occurs via self-reflection and prompt optimization using TextGrad.

In practice

Topics

Best for: Research Scientist, AI Researcher, AI Scientist, NLP Engineer

Related on AIssential

Open in AIssential →

Editorial summary, takeaway, and curation by AIssential. Original article published by cs.AI updates on arXiv.org.