HalluTruthQA: A Fine-Grained Benchmark for Hallucination Detection, Localization, and Explanation in Arabic Question Answering

· Source: cs.CL updates on arXiv.org · Field: Technology & Digital — Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning, Data Science & Analytics · Depth: Expert, extended

Summary

HalluTruthQA introduces a fine-grained benchmark for evaluating hallucination in Arabic question answering, comprising 2,400 expert-curated examples across Islamic knowledge, history, science, and geography. Each entry features an Arabic question, a Fanar-generated answer, a verified reference, a binary hallucination label, character-level erroneous spans, human-written explanations, and six candidate answers for factual verification. The benchmark evaluates four open-source LLMs—Allam, Falcon-H1, Qwen32, and Silma—in a zero-shot setting across detection, span-level localization, factual verification, and explanation tasks. Results indicate no single model achieves top performance across all tasks, with Allam leading detection (0.880 Macro-F1) and explanation (0.644), Qwen32 excelling in localization (0.516 F1-Sp), and Falcon-H1 in factual verification (0.852 LO-Score). The study emphasizes moving beyond simple detection to granular error analysis.

Key takeaway

For NLP engineers developing or deploying Arabic LLMs for knowledge-intensive QA, you must move beyond simple binary hallucination detection. Your evaluation and mitigation strategies should integrate span-level localization, factual verification, and explanation quality metrics. Focus on addressing specific error patterns, such as temporal/numerical normalization and source attribution, which current models struggle with, to significantly enhance factual reliability.

Key insights

Hallucination evaluation for Arabic LLMs demands fine-grained detection, localization, verification, and explanation, not just binary labels.

Principles

Method

A two-pass annotation process by domain experts and research assistants curates 2,400 QA examples with binary labels, character-level spans, explanations, and six candidate answers.

In practice

Topics

Code references

Best for: Research Scientist, AI Scientist, Machine Learning Engineer, NLP Engineer

Related on AIssential

Open in AIssential →

Editorial summary, takeaway, and curation by AIssential. Original article published by cs.CL updates on arXiv.org.