MMAE: A Massive Multitask Audio Editing Benchmark

· Source: cs.CL updates on arXiv.org · Field: Technology & Digital — Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning, Multimedia · Depth: Expert, quick

Summary

MMAE, a Massive Multitask Audio Editing benchmark, is introduced as the first comprehensive evaluation testbed for general-purpose instruction-based audio editing. Submitted on June 5, 2026, this open-source benchmark addresses the fragmented and limited scope of existing audio editing evaluations. MMAE encompasses 7 distinct audio modalities, including sound, speech, music, and their mixtures, and features a comprehensive taxonomy spanning 6 levels of task complexity, from basic modifications to multi-hop reasoning and multi-round editing, alongside 2 levels of granularity and 8 operation types. It consists of 2,000 high-fidelity samples and employs a pioneering rubric-based evaluation framework that breaks down free-form tasks into 17,741 verifiable criteria. Initial evaluations of leading models reveal significant limitations, with Exact Match Rates consistently below 5% and reaching 0% in complex, mixed-modality scenarios, highlighting critical bottlenecks in precise execution and structural robustness.

Key takeaway

For AI Scientists and Machine Learning Engineers developing instruction-based audio editing systems, you must recognize the severe limitations of current models. Your systems likely achieve Exact Match Rates below 5%, dropping to 0% in complex, mixed-modality tasks. You should integrate the MMAE benchmark into your development and evaluation pipelines to diagnose bottlenecks and prioritize improving precise execution and structural robustness for next-generation audio editing.

Key insights

The audio editing evaluation landscape is fragmented, and current models perform poorly on a new comprehensive benchmark.

Principles

Method

MMAE constructs a benchmark with 7 audio modalities, 6 complexity levels, 2 granularity levels, and 8 operation types, using 2,000 samples and a rubric-based framework with 17,741 criteria.

In practice

Topics

Code references

Best for: Research Scientist, AI Scientist, Machine Learning Engineer

Related on AIssential

Open in AIssential →

Editorial summary, takeaway, and curation by AIssential. Original article published by cs.CL updates on arXiv.org.