News Corp accuses search engine Brave of AI copyright infringement

2026-07-22 · Source: Semafor · Field: Legal & Regulatory — Intellectual Property & Patents, Compliance & Risk Management · Depth: Fundamental Awareness, quick

Summary

News Corp, owner of The Wall Street Journal and New York Post, has filed a lawsuit against Brave AI, a privacy-focused search engine featuring an AI sidebar. News Corp alleges Brave AI masks its web crawlers to avoid detection and delivers "verbatim or near verbatim copied content" summaries of news articles to enterprise AI companies. The complaint further claims that before March 2025, Brave scraped and sold copyrighted News Corp content, directly competing with News Corp's own content licensing programs. This legal action follows a year of failed licensing negotiations. Brave AI, in turn, filed its own lawsuit in February, asserting its web indexing constitutes standard search engine operation and accusing News Corp of market bullying. News Corp counters that Brave's AI use is not "fair use" as it merely regurgitates information without transformation. News Corp CEO Robert Thomson condemned Brave as "content crooks and brand brigands," emphasizing the need to protect journalism's future from such "tacky tech trafficking."

Key takeaway

For AI product managers developing features that summarize or repurpose web content, you must critically assess your content acquisition strategies and "fair use" claims. This lawsuit underscores the significant legal risks associated with scraping copyrighted material and monetizing AI outputs without explicit licensing. Ensure your models are genuinely transformative, or proactively secure licensing agreements to mitigate potential infringement litigation and protect your company's reputation.

Key insights

The legal battle between News Corp and Brave AI highlights the contentious intersection of AI content summarization, web scraping, and copyright law.

Principles

• AI companies face legal challenges over content acquisition and fair use claims.
• Copyright holders assert that unlicensed AI use undermines content monetization.
• Transformative use is a central legal argument in AI content disputes.

In practice

• Negotiate content licensing agreements with publishers for AI training.
• Evaluate AI summarization features for potential copyright infringement risks.

Topics

• AI Copyright Infringement
• Content Licensing
• Fair Use Doctrine
• Web Scraping
• Digital Media Law
• Brave AI

Best for: CTO, VP of Engineering/Data, Director of AI/ML, Legal Professional, AI Product Manager, Tech Journalist

Related on AIssential

• Publishers accuse Google of stealing copyrighted content in new lawsuit — Publishers accuse Google of copyright infringement for using books to train AI that competes with original works.
• Google’s anti-search-scraping lawsuit dismissed — Scraping public search results for AI training may not inherently violate copyright or DMCA.
• Microsoft trained its MAI models on unlicensed web data despite promising "enterprise grade, clean and commercially licensed data" — Microsoft's MAI models used unlicensed web data, challenging its "clean data" claims amidst ongoing fair use legal disputes.
• How AI Companies Can Pay Fair Rates for the Content They Need — The core conflict is AI companies using content freely versus creators demanding fair compensation.
• Judge Rules Blacked.com Can Sue Meta for Scraping Its Porn — Copyright infringement occurs upon unauthorized downloading and distribution, regardless of AI training intent.
• CNN says Perplexity is not merely learning from CNN in some abstract model-training sense, but repeatedly copying CNN content, retrieving it in real time,... — AI copyright litigation is shifting from training data to direct content reproduction and market substitution by "answer engines."

See Counsel's argued verdicts on the open AI decisions leaders are weighing →

Open in AIssential →

Editorial summary, takeaway, and curation by AIssential. Original article published by Semafor.