Support Your Local Collaborator

2026-01-16 · Source: Astral Codex Ten · Field: Government & Public Sector — Public Policy & Governance, Regulatory Affairs & Government Relations · Depth: Intermediate, medium

Summary

The article details a recurring pattern where Trump administration officials propose "insane plans" that threaten American industries or demographics, with effective pushback often originating from loyal Republicans rather than liberals. These "thoughtful collaborators" leverage their established influence to prevent the worst outcomes, as exemplified by the reversal of an attempt to cancel a revolutionary flu vaccine's review. However, this critical resource of influential, loyal dissenters is diminishing, gradually replaced by less effective loyalists. The author urges liberals not to pressure these individuals into public condemnation, arguing that their quiet efforts to mitigate harm, even if perceived as "whitewashing," are crucial for preventing significant damage. Ultimately, the piece contends that the practical benefits of preventing disaster, such as saving lives or protecting industries, outweigh minimal political risks or non-consequentialist ethical concerns about "collaboration."

Key takeaway

Mitigating potentially damaging policy decisions affecting AI/ML, such as arbitrary bans or regulatory overreach, is most effectively achieved through internal dissent from loyal, trusted collaborators within the administration's orbit, rather than external liberal protests. This approach leverages individuals with established loyalty to influence policy reversals, as demonstrated by successful campaigns preventing arbitrary bans or regulatory actions that could devastate specific industries or academic fields. For AI/ML professionals, this implies that strategic, non-confrontational engagement with politically aligned stakeholders, even those with whom one disagrees, can be crucial for preserving innovation and preventing policy-induced setbacks.

Topics

• Political Strategy
• Policy Advocacy
• Government Influence
• Ethical Governance
• Administration Dynamics

Best for: Policy Maker, Consultant, Executive

Related on AIssential

• Mexican leader Sheinbaum’s popularity slides on corruption revelation — Global stability is increasingly challenged by intertwined geopolitical conflicts, economic pressures, and the rapid, dual-use advancement of artificial intelligence.
• Northeastern, Columbia and more—Why American college students are protesting against AI - ThePrint — Student and faculty protests highlight growing concerns over AI's impact on academic integrity, surveillance, and job prospects in higher education.
• CLAUDE JUST GOT BANNED — A U.S. government directive has banned Anthropic's AI due to a standoff over military usage terms, impacting its market position.
• How big tech got its way on Trump’s AI executive order — Tech industry lobbying successfully halted US government AI safety regulation, prioritizing rapid advancement over security concerns.
• AI Giants Go on Charm Offensive to Avert Public Backlash — AI companies are shifting from opposing regulation to actively shaping it due to public pressure.
• Book Review: Intellectuals and Society by Thomas Sowell — Intellectuals insulated from consequences can perpetuate bad ideas due to a broken feedback loop.

Open in AIssential →

Editorial summary, takeaway, and curation by AIssential. Original article published by Astral Codex Ten.