Has anyone successfully migrated big AI workloads off AWS/Azure while staying in Europe?
Summary
European AI teams are increasingly exploring alternatives to major US cloud providers like AWS and Azure due to persistent issues such as extended GPU wait times, prohibitive egress fees, and critical data residency concerns. This inquiry seeks firsthand accounts from organizations that have successfully migrated substantial AI training or inference workloads to Europe-focused cloud infrastructure. The goal is to understand the practicalities of such migrations, including unforeseen challenges ("gotchas"), and the resulting impact on operational costs, network latency, and regulatory compliance post-transition. Real-world experiences are sought to inform others considering similar strategic shifts.
Key takeaway
For CTOs and VP of Engineering overseeing AI initiatives in Europe, evaluating a migration from US-centric cloud providers to European alternatives is becoming critical. Your teams should investigate local cloud options to mitigate GPU scarcity, reduce high egress costs, and ensure data residency compliance, potentially improving both operational efficiency and regulatory posture.
Key insights
European AI teams face challenges with US cloud providers, prompting interest in local alternatives.
Principles
- Data residency is a key driver for cloud migration.
- Egress fees significantly impact cloud cost models.
In practice
- Evaluate European cloud providers for AI workloads.
- Assess GPU availability and wait times.
- Compare egress fees across cloud platforms.
Topics
- AI Workloads
- Cloud Migration
- Data Residency
- GPU Availability
- Egress Fees
Best for: CTO, VP of Engineering/Data, MLOps Engineer, AI Architect, Director of AI/ML
Related on AIssential
Editorial summary, takeaway, and curation by AIssential. Original article published by Machine Learning ML & Generative AI News.