The World's Strictest Law on Human-Like AI
Summary
China's new "Interim Measures for the Administration of Humanized Interactive Services Based on AI" will take effect on July 15, 2026, establishing the world's strictest and most comprehensive legal framework for anthropomorphic AI. This regulation applies to continuous emotional interaction services simulating human personality, thinking, and communication, such as emotional care and companionship, but excludes services like intelligent customer service or work assistants. It mandates providers to ensure national security, public interest, and user rights, prohibiting content that endangers national security, promotes self-harm, or induces addiction. The law outlines responsibilities for various state departments and industry organizations, requires robust security management systems, and specifies rules for training data, user agreements, and protection for minors and the elderly. Providers must conduct security assessments for services with over 1 million registered users or 100,000 monthly active users and face fines ranging from RMB10,000 to RMB200,000 for violations.
Key takeaway
For policymakers and legal professionals developing AI governance frameworks, China's anthropomorphic AI law offers a comprehensive model for addressing human vulnerabilities. You should analyze its specific provisions on content moderation, data security, and protections for minors and the elderly to inform your own regulatory strategies. This framework demonstrates that robust AI regulation is achievable without stifling innovation, providing a blueprint for balancing development with security and ethical considerations.
Key insights
China's new AI law sets a global precedent for strict regulation of human-like AI, prioritizing user protection and national security.
Principles
- Balance AI innovation with security.
- Regulate human-like AI contextually.
- Prioritize user mental health.
Method
Providers must establish comprehensive management systems, conduct security assessments, manage training data, and implement age-appropriate protections for minors and the elderly.
In practice
- Implement content moderation for harmful outputs.
- Develop "minor mode" for AI services.
- Provide clear AI interaction disclosures.
Topics
- Anthropomorphic AI
- AI Governance
- Data Security
- Minor Protection
- Cybersecurity
- China AI Law
Best for: CTO, VP of Engineering/Data, Director of AI/ML, Policy Maker, Legal Professional, AI Ethicist
Related on AIssential
See Counsel's argued verdicts on the open AI decisions leaders are weighing →
Editorial summary, takeaway, and curation by AIssential. Original article published by Luiza's Newsletter.