Minimal Comparison of Octagonal Abstract Domains

· Source: cs.SE updates on arXiv.org · Field: Science & Research — Mathematics & Computational Sciences, Engineering & Applied Sciences · Depth: Expert, extended

Summary

This work introduces a novel algorithm for eliminating spurious constraints for Octagons, a numerical abstract domain. The approach evaluates its effectiveness by comparing the precision of 6,930 invariants from different abstract domains. Results demonstrate that a minimal comparison technique, when combined with the new spurious constraint reduction algorithm (MN+Reduction), significantly reclassifies many invariants as equivalent. For Octagons versus Intervals, the proportion of Octagon invariants deemed more precise dropped from 86% (full comparison) to 36%. Similarly, for Octagons versus Zones, this proportion decreased from 26% to 6%. When comparing Octagons with the incomparable Symbolic Predicates domain, equivalent invariants increased from 17% to 54%, and all 11 previously UNKNOWN queries were resolved due to reduced query size. These findings suggest that Octagons often compute predominantly interval invariants.

Key takeaway

For research scientists evaluating abstract domain precision in static analysis, you should integrate spurious constraint reduction into your comparison methodology. Traditional full comparisons overestimate Octagon precision, as shown by reclassifying many invariants as equivalent. Applying the novel Algorithm 2 for Octagons, combined with minimal comparison, provides a more accurate view of precision benefits, especially for incomparable domains, and can resolve previously "UNKNOWN" SMT solver queries.

Key insights

A novel algorithm for spurious constraint reduction in Octagon abstract domains improves minimal comparison of invariant precision.

Principles

Method

The paper presents Algorithm 2, an $O(N^2)$ constraint reduction algorithm for Octagons, which removes redundant couplings by setting spurious constraint values to +∞ before applying Algorithm 1 for minimal variable identification.

In practice

Topics

Best for: AI Scientist, Research Scientist

Related on AIssential

Open in AIssential →

Editorial summary, takeaway, and curation by AIssential. Original article published by cs.SE updates on arXiv.org.