MemArchitect: A Policy Driven Memory Governance Layer

· Source: cs.MA updates on arXiv.org · Field: Technology & Digital — Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning, Software Development & Engineering · Depth: Advanced, long

Summary

MemArchitect introduces a policy-driven memory governance layer designed to address the "Governance Gap" in Large Language Models (LLMs) evolving into persistent agents. Unlike standard Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) systems that treat memory as passive storage, MemArchitect actively manages memory through explicit, rule-based policies. It enforces a unified governance protocol across four domains: Lifecycle & Hygiene, Consistency & Truth, Provenance & Trust, and Efficiency & Safety, preventing issues like contradictions, privacy violations, and "zombie memories." The system operates via a "Triage & Bid" economy, where information competes for context window inclusion. Experimental results on the LoCoMo-10 benchmark show MemArchitect achieving a +7.45% aggregate accuracy improvement over raw memory, outperforming SimpleMem significantly, and demonstrating superior abstract synthesis and long-horizon coherence compared to MemOS, despite some trade-offs in raw recall.

Key takeaway

For AI Scientists and Machine Learning Engineers developing autonomous LLM agents, consider integrating a dedicated memory governance layer like MemArchitect. Your systems can achieve greater reliability and reduce "memory hallucination" by actively managing context through policy-driven adjudication rather than passive storage. This approach shifts failure modes from unchecked hallucination to manageable pruning, enhancing long-horizon coherence and abstract synthesis in agentic environments.

Key insights

MemArchitect provides policy-driven memory governance for LLM agents, actively managing context to prevent hallucinations and improve reliability.

Principles

Method

MemArchitect employs a "Triage & Bid" economy with a policy engine enforcing rules across lifecycle, consistency, retrieval, and efficiency domains, using FSRS decay, Kalman filters, and adaptive scoring.

In practice

Topics

Code references

Best for: AI Scientist, Research Scientist, Machine Learning Engineer, AI Researcher, AI Engineer, AI Architect

Related on AIssential

Open in AIssential →

Editorial summary, takeaway, and curation by AIssential. Original article published by cs.MA updates on arXiv.org.