Be Consistent! Enhancing Robust Visual Reasoning in LVLMs with Consistency Constraints

· Source: cs.CV updates on arXiv.org · Field: Technology & Digital — Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning, Multimodal AI · Depth: Advanced, extended

Summary

Researchers introduced ConVBench, a new benchmark designed to evaluate Large Vision-Language Models' (LVLMs) complex visual reasoning and logical consistency. ConVBench features images paired with two logically equivalent questions across six categories: action and state, complex counting, spatial reasoning, causal and intent understanding, commonsense reasoning, and temporal perception. To complement this, they developed ConVLM, an LVLM enhanced through Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) with a novel consistency reward. ConVLM leverages automatically generated logically equivalent question-answer pairs and a dual reward system balancing accuracy and consistency. The 7B variant of ConVLM achieved 73.36% average Consistency and 66.83% Accuracy on ConVBench, significantly surpassing closed-source models like Claude-3.5-Sonnet-V2 by 11.12% and 20.94% respectively. ConVLM also demonstrated strong generalization, achieving 84.90% accuracy on V*Bench.

Key takeaway

For Machine Learning Engineers developing robust LVLMs, you should integrate consistency-based reinforcement learning into your training pipelines. This approach, using automatically generated logically equivalent question pairs and a dual accuracy-consistency reward, significantly improves model reliability and generalization beyond traditional supervised fine-tuning. Consider adopting GRPO with sample-wise consistency rewards to enhance both correctness and logical stability in complex visual reasoning tasks.

Key insights

LVLMs can achieve robust, consistent visual reasoning by training with logically equivalent question pairs and a dual accuracy-consistency reward.

Principles

Method

ConVLM uses a two-stage process: GPT-4.1 generates logically equivalent question-answer pairs, then GRPO-based reinforcement learning optimizes LVLMs with a dual reward combining accuracy and consistency signals, even with noisy pseudo-labels.

In practice

Topics

Code references

Best for: Research Scientist, Computer Vision Engineer, AI Scientist, Machine Learning Engineer

Related on AIssential

Open in AIssential →

Editorial summary, takeaway, and curation by AIssential. Original article published by cs.CV updates on arXiv.org.