If they ever achieve asi and are able to eliminate most of not all jobs they will unleash an extinction level bio weapon before giving us ubi

2026-02-13 · Source: Artificial Intelligence · Field: Technology & Digital — Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning, Emerging Technologies & Innovation, AI Ethics & Societal Impact · Depth: Fundamental Awareness, medium

Summary

Discussions surrounding Universal Basic Income (UBI) in the context of Artificial General Intelligence (ASI) are largely dismissed as unrealistic, particularly within the current political and economic landscape of the United States. Critics argue that the existing political climate, characterized by resistance to social programs and corporate tax reform, makes UBI implementation improbable, even as the stock market reaches historic highs. There is a strong sentiment that wealthy elites and "tech bros" promoting UBI are disingenuous, using it as a distraction while they consolidate power and wealth from AI advancements. Many fear that if ASI achieves job elimination, these elites would hoard the gains, potentially leading to a dystopian future where most humans are deemed obsolete or even a burden on limited natural resources, rather than benefiting from a shared prosperity.

Key takeaway

For policymakers and futurists evaluating the societal impact of advanced AI, you should critically assess the political and economic realities of UBI implementation. Do not assume that technological advancement automatically translates into equitable distribution; instead, focus on developing robust regulatory frameworks and social safety nets that are politically viable and address potential resource scarcity, rather than relying on the speculative promise of UBI from those who may benefit most from AI's consolidation of power.

Key insights

UBI in an ASI-driven future is widely seen as a political fantasy, not a societal inevitability.

Principles

• Political will for UBI is currently absent.
• Elites may prioritize control over equitable distribution.

In practice

• Examine political feasibility of social programs.
• Analyze elite motivations behind UBI advocacy.

Topics

• Universal Basic Income
• Advanced Superintelligence
• AI Control
• Human Obsolescence
• Elite Intentions

Best for: AI Ethicist, Policy Maker, Tech Journalist

Related on AIssential

• Dumb question: If AI destroys all the jobs, who will be able to buy the stuff that AI-powered companies create? Doesn’t AI destroy its own customer base? — AI-driven job displacement raises fundamental questions about future economic demand and wealth distribution.
• Dario Amodei's new essay reads like a Cold War playbook for the AI age — Frontier AI models require binding regulation, mandatory third-party audits, and societal resilience plans due to their strategic, geopolitical risks.
• Get ready for the plunge — The "Assumption of Indispensability of Labor" (AIL) is being dismantled by AI, causing economic and ontological crises.
• Nick Bostrom Has a Plan for Humanity’s ‘Big Retirement’ — Bostrom now posits that AI's potential to overcome human mortality might outweigh its existential risks.
• How AGI will DESTROY the ELITES — AGI will commoditize competence, shifting elite value from intelligence to liability and human preference articulation.
• Confronting the Intelligence Curse, w/ Luke Drago of Workshop Labs, from the FLI Podcast — AI replacing human economic actors risks concentrating power and disempowering individuals, creating an "Intelligence Curse."

Open in AIssential →

Editorial summary, takeaway, and curation by AIssential. Original article published by Artificial Intelligence.