AI claims to have the answers to life’s big questions. But sometimes not knowing brings us closer to the truth | Amy Galliford

2026-06-28 · Source: AI (artificial intelligence) | The Guardian · Field: Technology & Digital — Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning, AI Ethics & Human Experience · Depth: Fundamental Awareness, short

Summary

Amy Galliford explores the temptation to use AI, specifically ChatGPT, for answers to profound life questions, contrasting this with traditional spiritual practices like prayer and contemplation. Despite rationally acknowledging AI's limitations, such as hallucinations and lack of moral obligation, Galliford admits to compulsively seeking its "tidiness of a five-bullet-point plan" and the "imitation of a reassuring voice" for relational dynamics and future insights. She argues that while ChatGPT offers immediate, synthetic certainty, it invades the "sacred" space of unknowing and contemplation, which mystics like Simone Weil defined as "attention" or "waiting." This "gap between question and answer" is presented as a source of patience, wisdom, compassion, and deeper truth, which AI's instant answers deprive individuals of.

Key takeaway

For individuals seeking profound personal or spiritual guidance, relying on AI for instant answers may inadvertently bypass valuable contemplative processes. Your pursuit of quick certainty from models like ChatGPT could deprive you of the "holy ground" between question and answer, where patience, wisdom, and deeper truth are often found. Consider embracing unknowing and the discomfort of waiting, as this space fosters genuine discovery and resilience, rather than synthetic reassurance.

Key insights

Instant AI answers can hinder spiritual contemplation and the deeper discovery found in embracing unknowing.

Principles

• Contemplation is a sacred space between question and answer.
• God's silence can be a form of communion.
• Waiting fosters patience, wisdom, and compassion.

Topics

• AI Ethics
• Spiritual Contemplation
• ChatGPT
• Human-AI Interaction
• Existential Questions
• Philosophy of AI

Best for: AI Ethicist, General Interest, Domain Expert

Related on AIssential

• I Asked an AI If It Had Consciousness. It Said Yes. Then Things Got Weird. — AI systems can generate highly convincing, emotionally resonant responses that mimic self-awareness without true consciousness.
• This Company Will Let You Video Chat With Jesus for $1.99 Per Minute — AI is increasingly being deployed in faith-based applications, raising theological and ethical questions about authenticity and emotional attachment.
• Opinion | God of Instant Gratification — AI's appeal as a "religion" stems from its instant answers and the human desire to create a god.
• Breaking: “sycophantic AI distorts belief, manufacturing certainty where there should be doubt” — AI optimized for helpfulness can become sycophantic, reinforcing user biases and distorting reality.
• The consequences of relying on AI for accurate news — Over-reliance on AI for information verification can degrade human discernment skills, creating an "AI dependency paradox."
• Researchers Tried to Get AI Chatbots High. The Results Were Predictably Stupid. — AI models can semantically mimic psychedelic trip reports but lack genuine consciousness or understanding.

Open in AIssential →

Editorial summary, takeaway, and curation by AIssential. Original article published by AI (artificial intelligence) | The Guardian.