The Guardian view on changes to copyright laws: authors should be protected over big tech | Editorial

2026-03-13 · Source: AI (artificial intelligence) | The Guardian · Field: Legal & Regulatory — Intellectual Property & Patents, Regulatory Affairs & Government Relations · Depth: Intermediate, short

Summary

At the London Book Fair in March 2026, authors protested against AI theft of their work, launching "Human Authored" logos and distributing blank books titled "Don't Steal This Book." This action precedes the UK government's progress report on AI and copyright, following controversial proposals for an "opt-out" policy that would require writers to actively refuse permission for their work to be used in AI training. A University of Cambridge study indicated that nearly 60% of authors believe their work has been used without consent, and almost 40% reported a decline in income due to generative AI. While fiction sales are rising, nonfiction sales dropped 6% in 2025, the lowest since 2014, though specific first-person accounts by women bucked this trend. Authors and organizations like the Society of Authors are advocating for consent, fair payment, and transparency regarding AI's use of copyrighted material, emphasizing the need for robust legislation to protect human creativity and livelihoods against unlicensed use by global tech companies.

Key takeaway

For CTOs and VPs of Engineering navigating AI development, your teams should prioritize ethical AI practices by ensuring all training data is acquired with explicit consent and fair compensation to creators. The UK's creative industries contribute significantly to the economy, and neglecting author protections risks stifling innovation and trust. You must advocate for robust, transparent copyright frameworks that safeguard human-authored content, rather than relying on ambiguous "opt-out" policies that burden creators and invite legal challenges.

Key insights

Authors are demanding robust copyright legislation to protect their work and livelihoods from unlicensed AI use.

Principles

• Human creativity requires protection.
• Consent and fair payment are fundamental.
• Transparency in AI data sourcing is essential.

In practice

• Implement "Human Authored" labeling schemes.
• Advocate for opt-in copyright policies.
• Support legislation for AI data transparency.

Topics

• AI Copyright Law
• Generative AI Impact
• Author Rights
• UK AI Policy
• Content Attribution

Best for: CTO, VP of Engineering/Data, Director of AI/ML, Policy Maker, Legal Professional, AI Ethicist

Related on AIssential

• Copyright and AI Policy Needs Precision, Not Panic — AI policy needs nuanced solutions that protect creators without empowering corporate intermediaries or stifling innovation.
• For publishers and rights owners, the EU playbook rewards those who turn rights enforcement into repeatable infrastructure (opt-out + monitoring + evidence). — The EU balances AI innovation with copyright protection via TDM exceptions and AI Act transparency.
• The AI Ethics Brief #179: Seen, But Not Heard: AI's Impact On Labour — AI adoption across sectors necessitates robust ethical frameworks and worker-centric governance to mitigate negative impacts.
• We Asked the ‘Future of Truth’ Author to Explain How He Used AI. It Didn’t Go Well — The irony of a book on AI and truth containing AI-generated falsehoods highlights critical authorial responsibility.
• AI will become normal in publishing, but trust will become scarce. The market will reward those who can prove provenance, quality, legality and human accountability. — AI adoption in publishing outpaces trust and governance, creating an "adoption paradox" with significant ethical and operational challenges.
• BMG sues Anthropic for using Bruno Mars, Rolling Stones lyrics in AI training — AI training on copyrighted content faces increasing legal challenges, particularly from aggressive copyright holders like music labels.

Open in AIssential →

Editorial summary, takeaway, and curation by AIssential. Original article published by AI (artificial intelligence) | The Guardian.