When NOT to use /goal in Codex

· Source: How I AI · Field: Technology & Digital — Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning, Software Development & Engineering · Depth: Intermediate, quick

Summary

The article focuses on the appropriate application of the "/goal" feature within Codex. It advises against using "/goal" for simple, single-line code edits, as it is an overly complex tool for such tasks. Similarly, "/goal" is deemed ineffective for vague objectives like "make my customers happy" or "refactor this code," which lack clear, measurable completion conditions. The feature is most effective when applied to durable objectives that remain stable over time, possess an evidence-based finish line, and necessitate a multi-step investigative path to achieve. This ensures the objective is measurable and requires the iterative problem-solving capabilities "/goal" is designed for.

Key takeaway

For AI Engineers or Prompt Engineers using Codex, if you are considering the "/goal" command for code modifications, ensure your objective is specific, measurable, and requires an iterative problem-solving approach. Avoid using "/goal" for trivial, single-line changes or ill-defined tasks like "refactor this code," as it will be inefficient and yield poor results. Instead, reserve it for complex, durable objectives with clear completion conditions that benefit from multi-turn investigation.

Key insights

Codex's /goal feature is best for complex, measurable objectives requiring multi-step investigation, not simple edits or vague tasks.

Principles

In practice

Topics

Best for: Prompt Engineer, Software Engineer, AI Engineer

Related on AIssential

Open in AIssential →

Editorial summary, takeaway, and curation by AIssential. Original article published by How I AI.