BacktestBench: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Automated Quantitative Strategy Backtesting

· Source: Computation and Language · Field: Technology & Digital — Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning, Data Science & Analytics, Capital Markets & Investment Management · Depth: Expert, quick

Summary

BacktestBench is introduced as the first large-scale benchmark designed for automated quantitative strategy backtesting, addressing the significant technical barriers and scalability issues in traditional methods. This benchmark is constructed from over 6 million real market records and features 18,246 annotated question-answering pairs, categorized into metrics calculation, ticker selection, strategy selection, and parameter confirmation. To complement the benchmark, the authors propose AutoBacktest, a multi-agent baseline system. AutoBacktest automates the translation of natural language strategies into reproducible backtests by coordinating a Summarizer for factor extraction, a Retriever for SQL generation, and a Coder for Python implementation. Evaluations across 23 mainstream LLMs using BacktestBench reveal critical factors influencing end-to-end performance, emphasizing the need for grounded verification and standardized indicator representations.

Key takeaway

For AI engineers developing financial applications, the BacktestBench and AutoBacktest framework highlight the necessity of specialized benchmarks for LLM-driven quantitative strategy backtesting. You should focus on integrating grounded verification mechanisms and standardized financial indicator representations into your LLM agents to improve the reliability and performance of automated trading strategy evaluations.

Key insights

Automated quantitative backtesting with LLMs requires specialized benchmarks and multi-agent systems for effective strategy evaluation.

Principles

Method

AutoBacktest uses a Summarizer, Retriever, and Coder agents to translate natural language strategies into Python backtests via SQL generation.

In practice

Topics

Best for: AI Engineer, AI Scientist, Machine Learning Engineer, Research Scientist

Related on AIssential

Open in AIssential →

Editorial summary, takeaway, and curation by AIssential. Original article published by Computation and Language.