Leveraging Self-Paced Curriculum Learning for Enhanced Modality Balance in Multimodal Conversational Emotion Recognition

· Source: cs.LG updates on arXiv.org · Field: Technology & Digital — Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning · Depth: Expert, extended

Summary

A novel plug-and-play module, Self-Paced Curriculum Learning (SPCL), is introduced to address modality imbalance and misalignment in Multimodal Emotion Recognition in Conversations (MERC). SPCL incorporates a dual-level Difficulty Measurer, which assesses both utterance-level recognition performance and conversation-level modality discrepancy, alongside a Learning Scheduler that dynamically guides training from easier to more challenging instances. Extensive experiments on the IEMOCAP and MELD datasets demonstrate consistent performance improvements. On IEMOCAP, SPCL achieved weighted F1-score gains ranging from approximately +1.2% to +6.6% over baseline models, while on MELD, improvements reached up to +10.4%. This approach significantly enhances model robustness and emotion recognition accuracy across diverse model architectures.

Key takeaway

For machine learning engineers developing Multimodal Emotion Recognition in Conversations (MERC) systems, consider integrating the Self-Paced Curriculum Learning (SPCL) module. Your models can achieve significant weighted F1-score improvements, ranging from +1.2% to +10.4% on benchmark datasets, by dynamically balancing modality contributions. Ensure careful tuning of the curriculum's initial threshold ("ε") and aging hyper-parameter ("α") to maintain a consistent, progressive learning rate, preventing overfitting or underutilization of weaker modalities.

Key insights

SPCL dynamically balances multimodal contributions in conversational emotion recognition by adaptively selecting training samples.

Principles

Method

SPCL uses a dual-level Difficulty Measurer (utterance loss, conversation-level modality standard deviation) and a Learning Scheduler with a hard regularizer and exponential pacing to dynamically select training samples, progressing from easy to hard.

In practice

Topics

Best for: Research Scientist, AI Scientist, Machine Learning Engineer, NLP Engineer

Related on AIssential

Open in AIssential →

Editorial summary, takeaway, and curation by AIssential. Original article published by cs.LG updates on arXiv.org.