Let’s call it what it is: antisocial media | Brief letters

2026-06-08 · Source: AI (artificial intelligence) | The Guardian · Field: Technology & Digital — Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning, Emerging Technologies & Innovation · Depth: Fundamental Awareness, quick

Summary

This collection of brief letters to the editor addresses several distinct contemporary issues. Colin Hines argues for renaming "social media" to "antisocial media," citing its negative impacts and lack of cooperative spirit, referencing a June 6 article on misinformation. Barbara McDowell highlights AI's ability to simulate empathy despite lacking it, recounting a personal experience with a phone's AI. John Lovelock points out the irony of David Sullivan, known for sensational newspaper headlines, expressing concern over unverified claims about himself. Richard A'Brook reminds readers that Members of Parliament can be contacted directly via official parliamentary email, negating the need for social media platforms. Finally, Graeme Richards clarifies the long-standing use of "mogging" in south Lincolnshire, defining it as aimless, scruffy wandering.

Key takeaway

For readers consuming daily news and engaging with digital platforms, critically evaluate information sources. Recognize that "social media" may often function as "antisocial media," fostering misinformation rather than cooperation. When contacting public officials, prioritize direct channels like official parliamentary email over social platforms. Be aware that AI can mimic human emotions without true empathy, and scrutinize claims, particularly from sources with a history of unverified content.

Topics

• Social Media Critique
• AI Empathy
• Misinformation
• Political Engagement
• Media Ethics

Best for: General Interest

Related on AIssential

• The Guardian view on the BBC’s future: who decides what news means? | Editorial — AI's mediation of news threatens journalistic truth and nuance by distilling information from biased, opaque sources.
• Attention Asymmetry in AI Layoff Discourse on X: A Computational Analysis of Capital vs Labour Amplification — On X, discourse favoring capital in AI layoffs receives significantly more amplification than labor-focused discourse, even after follower normalization.
• White House calls Mark Hamill ‘sick’ for posting AI image of Trump in a grave — AI-generated political imagery can provoke intense reactions and accusations of inciting violence.
• Users of social media and AI chatbots for health information are more likely to say they are convenient than accurate — Digital health information from social media and AI chatbots is valued for convenience and understandability, not accuracy.
• The Anti-AI Movement — Diverse public skepticism towards AI is growing, driven by economic, social, and ethical concerns, not just media narratives.
• Marc Andreessen on how the internet changed news, politics, and outrage | The a16z Show — The internet transforms all events into short-lived viral memes, driving online outrage while potentially reducing physical violence.

Open in AIssential →

Editorial summary, takeaway, and curation by AIssential. Original article published by AI (artificial intelligence) | The Guardian.