The AI industry is pouring hundreds of millions into US elections

2026-07-10 · Source: Blood in the Machine · Field: Technology & Digital — Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning, Emerging Technologies & Innovation · Depth: Fundamental Awareness, extended

Summary

Molly White's "Tech Influence Watch" project tracks hundreds of millions in political spending by the AI and cryptocurrency industries in US elections, highlighting a fundamental threat to democracy. The project, an evolution of "Follow the Crypto," reveals how tech billionaires like Andreessen Horowitz split contributions between pro-crypto and pro-AI super PACs, often run by the same operatives. For instance, the Alex Borges congressional campaign saw \$27 million in total spending, with OpenAI-backed "Leading the Future" spending \$8 million against him and Anthropic-backed "Public First" spending \$16 million in support. This spending aims to influence policy, with AI factions divided between deregulation (OpenAI) and "AI safety" (Anthropic), the latter often benefiting large companies competitively. The report also touches on local resistance to AI data centers, like a proposed nuclear AI facility in Ypsilanti, Michigan, and AI's contentious incursion into the arts, exemplified by A24's \$75 million deal with Google and the "Creators Act" bill.

Key takeaway

For policymakers and concerned citizens tracking election integrity, this analysis underscores how significant tech industry campaign spending, totaling over \$420 million from AI and crypto, can distort democratic processes. You should scrutinize the funding sources of political campaigns, especially those from PACs with vague names like "Leading the Future," to understand whose interests are truly being represented. Actively support campaign finance reform efforts and demand transparency from your elected officials regarding industry contributions to mitigate undue corporate influence.

Key insights

Tech industries' massive election spending prioritizes corporate interests over public concerns, threatening democracy.

Principles

• Campaign spending can shape legislative outcomes and candidate profiles.
• Industry-backed PACs often use broad, innocuous names to obscure funding sources.
• "AI safety" advocacy can serve competitive business interests for large firms.

Method

Molly White's "Tech Influence Watch" tracks political contributions from crypto and AI industries to monitor their influence on elections and policy.

In practice

• Consult "Tech Influence Watch" to identify industry-backed candidates.
• Pressure elected officials regarding industry campaign contributions.
• Support local resistance efforts against controversial tech infrastructure.

Topics

• AI Lobbying
• Crypto Lobbying
• Campaign Finance
• Political Influence
• Data Centers
• AI Ethics
• Digital Rights

Best for: Tech Journalist, Policy Maker, General Interest

Related on AIssential

• I’m launching Tech Influence Watch as AI follows crypto into politics — The crypto and AI industries are employing a coordinated, opaque political spending strategy to deregulate tech and influence policy.
• Sanders-backed progressives try to make AI the new AIPAC — Progressive Democrats are capitalizing on public skepticism of AI data centers as a potent campaign issue against establishment candidates.
• OpenAI isn’t being consistently candid about Leading the Future — OpenAI's public statements regarding its political advocacy group ties contradict internal views and external reporting, revealing complex, undisclosed influences.
• AI is inherently political. Donating $25M to Trump's PAC is also... very political. — OpenAI's president donated $25 million to a Trump Super PAC, influencing AI deregulation efforts.
• Issue 106 – A tremendous birthday present — Crypto and AI industries exert significant, often opaque, political and regulatory influence, frequently at the expense of investor protection and public trust.
• A Dark-Money Campaign Is Paying Influencers to Frame Chinese AI as a Threat — A Super PAC funded by OpenAI and Palantir is using influencers to promote American AI and raise concerns about China.

See Counsel's argued verdicts on the open AI decisions leaders are weighing →

Open in AIssential →

Editorial summary, takeaway, and curation by AIssential. Original article published by Blood in the Machine.