Rethinking SaaS Models in EV Charging: Why Usage-Based Software May Be the Path Forward

2026-07-01 · Source: The AI Journal · Field: Business & Management — Corporate Strategy & Leadership, Sales & Commercial Development, Operations & Process Management · Depth: Intermediate, medium

Summary

The EV charging industry's traditional prepaid SaaS model creates significant friction, shifting undue risk onto site owners and potentially slowing infrastructure deployment. This model, while common in other software categories, is ill-suited for the capital-intensive, construction-based, and utilization-dependent EV charging market. The article argues that layering long-term software obligations on top of existing costs for make-ready work, electrical upgrades, and hardware disconnects the industry from customer financial realities. Instead, it advocates for a flexible, usage-based software pricing (UBF) model, where site owners are charged based on dollars per kilowatt-hour delivered. This approach reduces upfront risk for property owners, aligns incentives for software providers to improve reliability and user experience, and provides data to justify future expansion, fostering more sustainable and accessible charging infrastructure.

Key takeaway

For distributors, developers, and property owners navigating EV charging infrastructure projects, re-evaluate traditional prepaid SaaS models that add financial friction and risk. Instead, advocate for and adopt usage-based software pricing (UBF) to align incentives, reduce upfront costs, and ensure software providers are directly invested in charger uptime and utilization. This approach fosters sustainable growth and data-driven expansion, making it easier to justify and scale EV charging assets.

Key insights

Usage-based software pricing aligns incentives and reduces deployment friction in the capital-intensive EV charging market.

Principles

• Software pricing must reflect asset performance.
• Align incentives across the entire ecosystem.
• Reduce barriers to infrastructure deployment.

Method

Implement usage-based fees (UBF) for EV charging software, charging site owners based on dollars per kilowatt-hour delivered, with rates linked to functionality and service level.

In practice

• Adopt UBF to reduce upfront risk for site owners.
• Use UBF to incentivize software provider reliability.
• Justify expansion with utilization data from UBF.

Topics

• EV Charging Infrastructure
• SaaS Models
• Usage-Based Pricing
• Software Monetization
• Infrastructure Deployment
• Electric Vehicles

Best for: Product Manager, Entrepreneur, Executive, Investor, Consultant

Related on AIssential

• eMabler secures €5.5M to scale EV charging software — Integrating EV charging into existing digital services and optimizing for grid conditions drives market success.
• Your SaaS Is an Insurance Product: A Modeling Framework — Capped-usage SaaS products are structurally identical to policy-limit insurance, requiring actuarial methods for pricing and risk management.
• Planning, Scheduling, and Behavior in EV Charging Systems: A Critical Survey and Trilemma Framework — EV charging system design faces a "PSB trilemma" balancing planning, scheduling, and user behavior fidelity with computational tractability.
• Enera raises $2M to improve the EV charging experience — Enera's AI platform unifies data to diagnose EV charging failures, improving reliability and driver experience.
• The SaaS Value Chain Is Breaking — The human-centric SaaS value chain and its per-seat pricing model are breaking due to evolving operational paradigms.
• Volvo is trying to put its EV stumbles in the rearview — Volvo's EX60 launch signals a strategic pivot towards software-defined EVs and diversified electrification, learning from past challenges.

Open in AIssential →

Editorial summary, takeaway, and curation by AIssential. Original article published by The AI Journal.