Safe Flow Q-Learning: Offline Safe Reinforcement Learning with Reachability-Based Flow Policies

· Source: cs.AI updates on arXiv.org · Field: Technology & Digital — Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning, Robotics & Autonomous Systems · Depth: Expert, extended

Summary

Safe Flow Q-Learning (SafeFQL) is a novel framework for safe offline reinforcement learning, extending Flow Q-Learning to incorporate strict safety constraints. It combines a Hamilton-Jacobi reachability-inspired safety value function with an efficient one-step flow policy, avoiding iterative denoising or rejection sampling at deployment. SafeFQL includes a conformal prediction calibration step to adjust safety thresholds for finite-data learning errors, providing probabilistic safety coverage. Empirically, SafeFQL demonstrates modestly higher offline training costs but substantially lower inference latency compared to diffusion-style safe generative baselines, making it suitable for real-time safety-critical control. It matches or exceeds prior offline safe RL performance across boat navigation and Safety Gymnasium MuJoCo tasks, significantly reducing constraint violations.

Key takeaway

For Robotics Engineers or ML teams developing real-time safety-critical control systems from offline data, SafeFQL offers a compelling solution. Its one-step policy extraction significantly reduces inference latency compared to generative baselines, enabling deployment in high-frequency loops. You should consider SafeFQL to achieve robust, probabilistically guaranteed safety with high reward performance, especially where even single constraint violations are unacceptable. This approach minimizes the need for manual safety tuning and complex rejection sampling.

Key insights

SafeFQL ensures real-time, probabilistic safety in offline RL via a one-step flow policy and reachability-based value function.

Principles

Method

SafeFQL learns reward/safety critics, fits a behavior flow teacher, distills it into a one-step actor, and optimizes the actor with a feasibility-gated objective, followed by conformal calibration.

In practice

Topics

Best for: Research Scientist, AI Scientist, Machine Learning Engineer, Robotics Engineer

Related on AIssential

Open in AIssential →

Editorial summary, takeaway, and curation by AIssential. Original article published by cs.AI updates on arXiv.org.