Comparative evaluation of training strategies using partially labelled datasets for segmentation of white matter hyperintensities and stroke lesions in FLAIR MRI
Summary
This study evaluated six deep learning training strategies for segmenting white matter hyperintensities (WMH) and ischaemic stroke lesions (ISL) in FLAIR MRI scans using partially labelled datasets. WMH and ISL are visually confounding features associated with cerebral small vessel disease. Researchers combined privately held and publicly available datasets, totaling 2052 MRI volumes, with 1341 containing WMH annotations and 1152 containing ISL annotations. The investigation found that several methods effectively leveraged partially labelled data to enhance model performance, with pseudolabels yielding the best overall results. The models were trained and tested across 12 diverse datasets, demonstrating improved performance, particularly on datasets not fully represented in the fully labelled subset. Qualitative analysis revealed that pseudolabel model outputs were often as plausible as ground truth, even identifying missing deep WMH instances.
Key takeaway
For Machine Learning Engineers developing medical image segmentation models with incomplete annotations, you should prioritize pseudolabeling strategies. This approach significantly improves performance for complex, visually confounding lesions like WMH and ISL, especially when integrating diverse datasets. Consider implementing a pseudolabel-trained multiclass model to enhance accuracy and robustness, but be aware of its potentially higher training complexity compared to simpler loss-based methods. Your qualitative analysis of model outputs will be crucial to validate clinical utility.
Key insights
Pseudolabeling is the most effective strategy for deep learning segmentation of confounding medical lesions using partially labeled MRI data.
Principles
- Partially labelled data boosts model performance.
- Pseudolabels improve segmentation accuracy.
- WMH segmentation has high inter-rater variability.
Method
Six strategies were compared using DynUNet on 2052 FLAIR MRI volumes. Preprocessing included bias correction, resampling to 1x1x1 mm, brain extraction, and z-score standardization. Training used Dice + cross-entropy loss with SGD and extensive augmentation.
In practice
- Use pseudolabels for optimal partially supervised segmentation.
- Discard unclear ISL scans from training/test sets.
- Employ DSCθ for robust WMH segmentation evaluation.
Topics
- Medical Image Segmentation
- Partially Labelled Data
- White Matter Hyperintensities
- Ischaemic Stroke Lesions
- Deep Learning
- FLAIR MRI
- Pseudolabeling
Code references
Best for: Computer Vision Engineer, AI Scientist, Machine Learning Engineer, Research Scientist
Related on AIssential
See Counsel's argued verdicts on the open AI decisions leaders are weighing →
Editorial summary, takeaway, and curation by AIssential. Original article published by cs.CV updates on arXiv.org.