Comparative evaluation of training strategies using partially labelled datasets for segmentation of white matter hyperintensities and stroke lesions in FLAIR MRI

· Source: cs.CV updates on arXiv.org · Field: Science & Research — Health & Medical Research, Mathematics & Computational Sciences · Depth: Expert, extended

Summary

This study evaluated six deep learning training strategies for segmenting white matter hyperintensities (WMH) and ischaemic stroke lesions (ISL) in FLAIR MRI scans using partially labelled datasets. WMH and ISL are visually confounding features associated with cerebral small vessel disease. Researchers combined privately held and publicly available datasets, totaling 2052 MRI volumes, with 1341 containing WMH annotations and 1152 containing ISL annotations. The investigation found that several methods effectively leveraged partially labelled data to enhance model performance, with pseudolabels yielding the best overall results. The models were trained and tested across 12 diverse datasets, demonstrating improved performance, particularly on datasets not fully represented in the fully labelled subset. Qualitative analysis revealed that pseudolabel model outputs were often as plausible as ground truth, even identifying missing deep WMH instances.

Key takeaway

For Machine Learning Engineers developing medical image segmentation models with incomplete annotations, you should prioritize pseudolabeling strategies. This approach significantly improves performance for complex, visually confounding lesions like WMH and ISL, especially when integrating diverse datasets. Consider implementing a pseudolabel-trained multiclass model to enhance accuracy and robustness, but be aware of its potentially higher training complexity compared to simpler loss-based methods. Your qualitative analysis of model outputs will be crucial to validate clinical utility.

Key insights

Pseudolabeling is the most effective strategy for deep learning segmentation of confounding medical lesions using partially labeled MRI data.

Principles

Method

Six strategies were compared using DynUNet on 2052 FLAIR MRI volumes. Preprocessing included bias correction, resampling to 1x1x1 mm, brain extraction, and z-score standardization. Training used Dice + cross-entropy loss with SGD and extensive augmentation.

In practice

Topics

Code references

Best for: Computer Vision Engineer, AI Scientist, Machine Learning Engineer, Research Scientist

Related on AIssential

Open in AIssential →

Editorial summary, takeaway, and curation by AIssential. Original article published by cs.CV updates on arXiv.org.