Detoxify: A framework for abusive text transformation using LLMs

· Source: cs.CL updates on arXiv.org · Field: Technology & Digital — Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning, Data Science & Analytics · Depth: Expert, extended

Summary

This study evaluates Large Language Models (LLMs) for transforming abusive text (tweets and reviews) into non-abusive versions while retaining original intent. The study compares Gemini-1.5-flash, GPT-4o, DeepSeek-V3, and Groq using two datasets: one from IIT Guwahati (160,000 entries) and a Twitter (X) dataset (4265 tweets). The methodology involves data acquisition, preprocessing, LLM API configuration, review transformation, and evaluation via sentiment and semantic analysis using BERT-based models like SenWave-BERT and MPNet-base-v2. Results show GPT-4o and DeepSeek-V3 have similar transformation rates and sentiment distributions, maintaining semantic similarity to original text. Gemini achieved higher transformation success rates (e.g., 80% in Batch 1 vs. Groq's 60%) due to configurable relaxed safety settings (BLOCK_NONE), which Groq lacked. Groq often produced longer, overly positive transformations, sometimes altering original semantic meaning, and had the lowest semantic similarity with original input.

Key takeaway

For NLP Engineers developing content moderation systems, your choice of LLM for abusive text transformation is critical. Gemini-1.5-flash offers higher transformation success due to configurable safety settings, but Groq may over-positivize, altering original meaning. GPT-4o and DeepSeek-V3 maintain better semantic similarity. Evaluate models based on your specific balance between aggressive detoxification and preserving original intent, especially considering API limitations and inherent model biases.

Key insights

LLMs can transform abusive text, but model-specific safety settings and inherent behaviors significantly impact transformation success and semantic preservation.

Principles

Method

A six-stage framework: data acquisition, preprocessing, LLM API configuration, abuse detection, review transformation, and final sentiment/semantic analysis using BERT-based models.

In practice

Topics

Code references

Best for: AI Engineer, Machine Learning Engineer, Research Scientist, AI Scientist, NLP Engineer, AI Ethicist

Related on AIssential

Open in AIssential →

Editorial summary, takeaway, and curation by AIssential. Original article published by cs.CL updates on arXiv.org.