Proofbusters at SemEval-2026 Task 11: Neuro-Symbolic Syllogistic Reasoning via LLM-Guided Structure Extraction and Deterministic Validation
Summary
The Proofbusters system, developed for SemEval-2026 Task 11, addresses English syllogism validity classification by enabling language models to perform formal reasoning independent of semantic content, thereby mitigating belief bias. Its core approach is symbolic abstraction, converting syllogisms into content-invariant logical forms. Three strategies were explored: Template abstraction (82.20% accuracy), Symbolic OOP abstraction (88.84% with Qwen-7B), and Set-theoretic abstraction. The system employs a two-stage pipeline for formulation (natural language to symbolic) and solving. The set-theoretic variant, utilizing Gemini Flash 2.5 for formulation and Gemini Pro 2.5 for solving, achieved 98.95% accuracy, a 2.13 total content effect, and an overall score of 46.23. This indicates that belief bias is tied to semantic surface form, suggesting robust logical reasoning requires architectural separation between semantic parsing and formal inference.
Key takeaway
For NLP Engineers developing logical reasoning systems, you should prioritize explicit symbolic abstraction to mitigate belief bias and achieve high accuracy in formal tasks like syllogism validity classification. Consider implementing a two-stage neuro-symbolic pipeline, separating semantic parsing from formal inference, rather than relying solely on prompt engineering for robust performance. This approach, exemplified by the 98.95% accuracy of the set-theoretic variant, offers a path to more reliable AI reasoning.
Key insights
Explicit symbolic abstraction enables LLMs to perform formal syllogistic reasoning, overcoming belief bias by reasoning over structure.
Principles
- Belief bias in LLMs stems from semantic surface form.
- Architectural separation improves formal inference.
- Content-invariant logical forms enhance reasoning.
Method
A two-stage pipeline: Formulation converts natural language syllogisms into symbolic representations, followed by a Solver stage that judges validity purely from these symbols.
In practice
- Use set-theoretic abstraction for formal logic tasks.
- Employ Gemini Flash 2.5 for NL-to-symbolic conversion.
- Separate semantic parsing from formal inference.
Topics
- Neuro-Symbolic AI
- Syllogistic Reasoning
- Large Language Models
- Belief Bias
- Formal Logic
- SemEval
- Set Theory
Best for: Research Scientist, AI Scientist, NLP Engineer
Related on AIssential
Editorial summary, takeaway, and curation by AIssential. Original article published by Paper Index on ACL Anthology.